Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-11-08

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The table and pie charts compare the number of visitors to Ashdown Museum after it was refurbished and the level of surveys visitors satisfied.

Overall, it is clear that the total number of visitors museum after refurbishment, and the satisfaction improved dramatically.

In year before refurbishment musuem received 74,000 visitors, and after refurbishment rose up in 92,000 as increases in 18000. In the satisfaction of year before refurbishment. The largest value of dissatisfied to 40%, followed by 30% satisfied, only 15% by just very satisfied. While the 10% very dissatisfied, the 5% had no response. In visitors satisfaction year after refurbishment, the very satisfied also increases 35%, and the satisfied went up the proportions of 40%. Dissatisfied also dropped the number of 15% than 40%. Very dissatisfied down the proprotion only 5%, the proportion refurbishment no response remained unchanged the 5%. The year after refurbishment also the highest value of the proportion.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You cover both the visitor totals and the satisfaction results, and the figures you report are generally accurate: visitors rose from 74,000 to 92,000, while dissatisfaction fell from 40% to 15%. Your overview also identifies an overall improvement in satisfaction. However, some comparisons are less clearly expressed, particularly the final statement, “The year after refurbishment also the highest value of the proportion,” which does not specify which category is highest. The overview could be more precise by highlighting that satisfied or very satisfied responses became the majority after refurbishment, while the no-response share stayed at 5%. This would make the main trends clearer and ensure the key features are fully developed.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall structure: it begins with an introduction and overview, then reports the visitor totals and survey categories in time order. This makes the information broadly easy to follow. Some linking is effective, such as “followed by” and “While,” but transitions are sometimes mechanical or attached to incomplete thoughts. For example, “In the satisfaction of year before refurbishment” is followed by a fragment, and the shift to the after-refurbishment results could be signposted more smoothly. The final sentence is also unclear and does not provide a useful conclusion. Grouping the satisfaction figures into positive and negative responses, with clear comparisons between the two years, would improve progression and cohesion.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant task vocabulary, including “refurbishment,” “dissatisfied,” “proportion,” and “remained unchanged,” and you attempt to describe change with phrases such as “rose up” and “dropped.” However, several word choices and collocations are inaccurate or repetitive, which sometimes makes the meaning unclear. For instance, “the level of surveys visitors satisfied” is not a natural way to describe survey results, and “increases in 18000” is awkward. There are also spelling errors in “musuem” and “proprotion.” Aim for precise reporting language and check spelling and word forms. A wider set of accurate verbs for increases and decreases would help you express the comparisons more naturally.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, and the main figures can usually be understood. However, errors in sentence structure and grammatical patterns are noticeable. For example, “the total number of visitors museum after refurbishment” is missing necessary grammatical elements, while “after refurbishment rose up in 92,000” has an incomplete subject and an incorrect preposition. The sentence beginning “In the satisfaction of year before refurbishment” is also not a complete grammatical construction, and “the proportion refurbishment no response remained unchanged the 5%” has unclear relationships between its parts. Practise complete clauses, articles, and accurate verb patterns, then check punctuation and sentence boundaries so that comparisons are expressed clearly.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.