Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The table presents the number of visitors who have visited Ashdown Museam after and before the refurbishent .The chart illustrates the information about the visitors that how much they satisfied with their visit,between the same two periods .

Overall, we can see a significiant increase in the amount of visitors after the development of the Museam.A noticeable growth in the proportion of very satisfied people.The amount of dissatisfied visitors decreased sharply after the year.

There is a noticeable growth in the ratio of very satissfied citizens after the modification of the Museam.The biggest change is that the satissfied people were increased sharply after the development .The people who were very dissatisfied were almost of the people before the refurbishment .

Before the development of the museam the dissatidfied people were almost double then the visitors after the developmet.

The amount of people who were not intersted was almost same during the two periods .

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You identify the main overall changes: visitor numbers rose after refurbishment, satisfaction improved, and dissatisfaction fell. These are relevant features, and the comparison that the number of dissatisfied visitors was almost double before refurbishment is broadly supported by the figures (40% versus 20% combined dissatisfied categories after). However, several details are unclear or inaccurate. The statement that “very dissatisfied” visitors were “almost of the people before” does not communicate a meaningful comparison, and “people who were not interested” mislabels the unchanged 5% who gave no response. You also repeat the rise in very satisfied visitors without giving the key figures, and omit the total visitor numbers. Select the main changes more precisely and support them with accurate comparisons.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has a basic overall structure: an introduction, an overview, and further comparisons. This helps the reader recognise the topic and the broad direction of change. However, progression is limited because the same point about growth in very satisfied visitors appears twice, first in the overview and again in the next paragraph. The comparisons are also presented in a loose sequence, and the final sentence about people who gave no response is not clearly connected to the preceding discussion. Some linking is attempted through “Overall,” “after,” and “Before,” but relationships between figures are not consistently made explicit. Group the visitor totals and satisfaction results into a clearer sequence, avoid repetition, and use references that make each comparison easy to follow.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some task-relevant vocabulary, including “proportion,” “dissatisfied,” “refurbishment,” and “increased sharply,” so the reader can generally identify the subject of the comparisons. However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate, sometimes making the intended meaning difficult to understand. For example, “people who were not interested” does not accurately describe respondents who gave no response, while “the amount of visitors” is not the natural expression for countable people. Spelling errors such as “Museam,” “significiant,” and “satissfied” are also noticeable. Build a more precise set of terms for survey categories and use standard spellings; this will make the report clearer and more appropriate to an academic summary.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple statements and longer constructions, including “The table presents…” and “The biggest change is that…,” but control is inconsistent. Errors in sentence structure and punctuation occur frequently: the opening sentence runs together two clauses, and spaces are missing before punctuation in several places. There are also problems with articles and comparison patterns, as in “almost double then the visitors,” and the phrase “were increased sharply” uses an awkward passive construction. The sentence “The people who were very dissatisfied were almost of the people before” is grammatically incomplete and obscures the comparison. Practise forming complete, direct comparison sentences, checking verb forms and articles, and separating clauses with appropriate punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.