Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The pie chat illustrate the number of tourist visited ashdown museum before year and after after it was refurbished. The chart represent the result of surveys asking tourist how satisfied they were with their visit, durinn both time periods.

Looking from an overall perspective, it is crystal clear that, the number of visitors before rufurbishment was less but after refurbishment, it increased by 18000.

Reporting the data in detail, before service, only 30% people were satisfied and while 15% were very satisfied. But the rate of dissatisfied were 40% and no response only 5%. And10% people were very dissatisfied.

Glancing at the remaining description, after refurbishment there are many changes. 40% poeple were satisfied and 35% were very satisfied. Ther rate of no response were 5% and very dissatisfied were almost same as no response. Only 15% people were dissatisfied. After year they was big diference between satisfied people and very satisfied as compare than past year.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You cover the main elements of the task by reporting the visitor increase from 74,000 to 92,000 and comparing satisfaction results before and after refurbishment. The figures you give for the survey categories are accurate, and your overview identifies the rise in visitor numbers. However, the overview is limited: it would be more informative to highlight the broad shift from dissatisfaction before refurbishment to satisfaction afterwards. Some comparisons are also under-developed; for example, you note that the satisfied and very satisfied groups differed after refurbishment, but do not clearly compare their changes with the earlier year. A fuller overview of the key trends would make the response more complete and purposeful.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, an overview, and two paragraphs describing the survey results for each period. This makes the information reasonably easy to follow. You also use sequencing phrases such as “Looking from an overall perspective” and “Reporting the data in detail” to signal the stages of your report. However, some linking is mechanical, and the final paragraph’s opening, “Glancing at the remaining description,” does not clearly connect the comparison to the previous paragraph. The sentence beginning “After year” also leaves the time reference unclear. Use simpler, more precise transitions and connect the two periods directly so the progression between comparisons is smoother.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use some task-relevant vocabulary, including “refurbished,” “satisfied,” “dissatisfied,” and “increased,” which allows you to report the main information. There is also an attempt to vary phrasing with expressions such as “overall perspective.” However, several word-choice and spelling errors reduce precision, including “pie chat” for the charts, “tourist” for visitors, “before service,” and “rufurbishment.” Some expressions are also unnatural, such as “the rate of dissatisfied” and “big diference.” Aim for accurate, conventional language for describing charts, and check spelling carefully. A more precise vocabulary range would help you express comparisons without relying on vague phrases.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, for example, “Looking from an overall perspective…” and “After year they was big diference…”. The main figures and comparisons are generally understandable, but some grammatical errors recur. These include subject–verb agreement in “the rate … were” and “they was,” missing or incorrect articles in “only 30% people,” and awkward sentence construction in “before year and after after it was refurbished.” Punctuation is also inconsistent, as in “it is crystal clear that, the number…”. Work on accurate noun phrases, agreement, and sentence boundaries before adding more complex structures. Greater control of these patterns would make the report clearer.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.