Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-11-14

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The given table provides the information about how many people visited the Ashdown Museum throughout the year before and after the redevelopment. The pie charts illustrates the satisfaction level of visitors during the same time duration.

Overall it can be seen that, there is a significant change in the numbers, visitors are increased after the refurbishment of the Museum. the numbers increased by 18000 compared to before redevelopment. Also the satisfaction level increased too, vis-`a-vis the number before the redevelopment.

Before the refurbishment half of the visitors are not satisfied with it. That is decreased to 20 per cent after the intervention. Also, in the satisfaction category 45 per cent were satisfied before that intervention , which now increased to 75 per cent. In adition, the very dissatisfied category is decreased to 5 per cent from 10 per cent.

The no response results intact in both of the time duration.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

You identify the main overall changes: visitor numbers rose from 74,000 to 92,000, and satisfaction improved after refurbishment. The comparisons that 50% were dissatisfied or very dissatisfied before, versus 20% afterwards, and that the combined satisfied categories rose from 45% to 75% are accurate and relevant. You also note that non-response remained unchanged. This covers the key features and supports a clear overview. However, the account is selective: it does not report the separate figures for very satisfied visitors, whose share rose from 15% to 35%, or for dissatisfied visitors, which fell from 40% to 15%. Including these would make the survey comparison more fully developed and precise rather than relying mainly on combined categories.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, an overview, and paragraphs describing the survey results. The progression from visitor totals to satisfaction categories is easy to follow, and linking expressions such as “Overall,” “Also,” and “In addition” help connect points. This gives the report a coherent arrangement. To make the progression more consistently smooth, avoid using “Also” repeatedly and group related figures more deliberately—for example, present the positive satisfaction categories together, then the negative categories. The final sentence about no response is relevant but feels detached; it could be integrated into the comparison paragraph. Some punctuation and capitalization choices also interrupt the flow between sentences.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of task-related vocabulary, including “refurbishment,” “satisfaction level,” “category,” and “decreased.” These choices make the main comparisons understandable, and “intervention” shows an attempt to vary wording. However, some expressions are imprecise or unnatural for describing chart data, such as “the numbers, visitors are increased,” “satisfaction level increased too,” and “the no response results intact.” “Redevelopment” is also used interchangeably with “refurbishment,” although the task concerns refurbishment. Spelling errors such as “adition” and the malformed “vis-à-vis” reduce accuracy. Prefer concise, conventional reporting language, such as “visitor numbers rose,” “satisfaction improved,” and “the proportion giving no response remained unchanged.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mixture of sentence forms, including an overview with a subordinate clause and comparisons using “from” and “to.” The main information is generally recoverable, but some grammatical errors remain and occasionally make the phrasing awkward. For example, “The pie charts illustrates” has subject–verb disagreement, while “visitors are increased” uses an incorrect passive form; write “visitor numbers increased.” In “Before the refurbishment half of the visitors are not satisfied,” the tense should be past, and the sentence needs clearer punctuation. The opening also has an unnecessary comma after “that.” Work on consistent past-tense reporting, agreement, articles, and sentence boundaries. More accurate control of these patterns would make your comparisons clearer.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.