Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-11-14

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The given table displays the number of travelers going to Ashdown Museum in year before its renovation and after year when it was completed. and then two pie charts representing the satisfaction level of those travelers after a survey during their visiting years.

One thing is clear that during the year before the refurbishment of the museum there were less visitors exactly 74 thousand and also their were overall less satisfied people who visited there and many dissatisfied visitors as well if we compare to the travelers to went there after its renovation because total number noteably increase to 92 thousand similarly the ratio of those who were satisfied also jumped from 45 to 75 percent mixing satisfied and very satisfied ones, Similarly there was significant decrease in the proportion of travelers who were dissatisfied first from 50 to 20 percent combining both dissatisfied and very dissatisfied ones. There were also those who did not gave response and their was no variation in their propertion both before and after modification of the museum.

In conclusion during the year before the refurbishment of the museum there was less visitors and less were satisfied but after renovation travelers increase and with it ratio of those are satisfied also.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You identify the main overall changes accurately: visitor numbers rose from 74,000 to 92,000, combined satisfaction increased from 45% to 75%, and combined dissatisfaction fell from 50% to 20%. You also note that non-response remained unchanged. This covers the key features and gives a clear overview, with the figures supporting your comparisons. To make the report more complete and precise, distinguish the four satisfaction categories rather than relying mainly on combined totals; for example, very satisfied visitors rose from 15% to 35%, while dissatisfied visitors fell from 40% to 15%. Some details are also expressed vaguely, such as “less satisfied people,” and the conclusion repeats the overview rather than adding a sharper comparison.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has an identifiable progression: an introduction, a paragraph comparing the figures, and a concluding summary. The main comparisons are generally easy to follow, and phrases such as “if we compare” help signal relationships. However, most of the data is crowded into one long paragraph, so the reader has to work through several comparisons at once. Linking is sometimes mechanical or unclear, particularly the repeated “and also” and the transition “Similarly” after a long sentence. The conclusion largely repeats earlier points. Separate the overview from the detailed comparisons, group visitor totals and satisfaction results logically, and use clearer sentence boundaries and references to make the progression smoother.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant task vocabulary, including “refurbishment,” “satisfaction level,” “proportion,” and “significant decrease,” and the reader can understand the main trends. There is some attempt to vary wording by referring to visitors as “travelers.” However, several choices are inaccurate or unnatural for this report: “travelers going to” is less suitable than “visitors to,” “mixing satisfied and very satisfied ones” is imprecise, and “their propertion” contains a spelling error. “Renovation,” “modification,” and “refurbishment” are used as if interchangeable, which makes the description less consistent. Aim for precise chart language such as “the proportion who were satisfied” and check spelling and collocations carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including comparisons using “if we compare” and clauses describing changes in satisfaction. The overall meaning is usually recoverable, but grammatical control is uneven, and errors sometimes make sentences difficult to process. For example, “in year before its renovation” needs an article, while “there were less visitors” has an agreement and count-noun problem. The opening also contains a sentence fragment beginning “and then,” and the long comparison sentence has faulty punctuation and several clauses joined without clear boundaries. Review articles, subject–verb agreement, and sentence boundaries; breaking the central comparison into shorter sentences would make your ideas clearer while retaining complex structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.