Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-11-14

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The tables demonstrates the number of tourists visited the Ashdown museum before and after renovation.whereas the piecharts illustrates the outcome of the survey which was carried out before and after renovating Ashdown musem.

It can be seen that from the given table the number of toursists who visited the ashdown musem before renovating was stated exactly 74,000 . after making the changes the visitors were significantly increased it can be lisited as 92,000. it shows individuals attracted after developing the musem.

In contrast, firstly the piecharts shows that the survey of visitors before and after renovating the ashdown musem. backthen, almost majority of visitors were highly dissatisfied for sightseeing the musem it shows as 40%. just proportional of 30% were satisfied with the musem. moreover,

marginal people were fully satisfied which is just 15%, although, dissatisfied and no response were comparetively was very low they showed less interest towards survey.

additionally, the result after renovating the ashdown musem was highly succed ,consequently, it can be seen substaintial visitors were satisfied which can be lisited as 40%. whereas, extemly satisfied lisited as 35% which can be seen that there is drastic change in the survey. eventually

only miniscule visitors disastified .no response listed as same . overall, visitors were highly satisfied after renovating the musem.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You cover both the visitor totals and the satisfaction surveys, and the main changes are clear: attendance rose from 74,000 to 92,000, while satisfaction improved after refurbishment. You also identify the largest pre-refurbishment group as dissatisfied (40%) and report the post-refurbishment satisfied and very satisfied figures (40% and 35%). This addresses the task, but some details are unclear or inaccurate. Before refurbishment, 15% were very satisfied, not merely “marginal people,” and the 10% who were very dissatisfied is not clearly reported. The statement that dissatisfied and no-response figures were both “very low” overlooks the 40% dissatisfied figure. A more precise overview and a complete, clearly labelled comparison of the survey categories would make the report more fully developed.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable sequence: an introduction, a paragraph on visitor numbers, and a discussion of survey results, ending with an overall comment. This gives the reader a basic framework. However, progression within the survey paragraph is difficult to follow because categories and comparisons are not consistently grouped, and several transitions are mechanical or unclear. For example, “In contrast, firstly” does not establish a clear contrast, while “additionally” and “eventually” do not reliably signal the relationship between the figures. The long survey paragraph also combines several points without clear sentence boundaries. Organise the two survey years in a consistent order, compare corresponding categories directly, and use paragraphing and linking phrases to show those relationships.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You attempt a range of vocabulary relevant to describing change, including “significantly increased,” “substantial,” “drastic change,” and “miniscule.” However, word choice and collocation are often inaccurate or repetitive, which sometimes makes the meaning difficult to interpret. For instance, “number of tourists visited” is not a natural way to describe the museum’s visitor total, and “marginal people were fully satisfied” does not clearly express the 15% figure. There are also frequent spelling errors, such as “musem,” “toursists,” “succed,” and “disastified.” Use precise chart language consistently—such as “visitors,” “accounted for,” and “the proportion of respondents”—and check spelling and collocations before submitting.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more extended sentence forms, including a clause beginning “although” and a result clause with “consequently.” Some basic meaning is understandable, but grammatical control is uneven, and errors in sentence structure, agreement, articles, and punctuation often make the reader work to follow the message. Examples include “The tables demonstrates,” where the subject and verb do not agree, and “the visitors were significantly increased,” where the verb construction is faulty. Several sentences run together or begin with lowercase letters after full stops, as in “after making the changes.” Aim for shorter, complete sentences first, with accurate subject–verb agreement and consistent past-tense reporting; then add complex clauses where you can control their structure.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.