Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-07-25

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The charts given below illustrate the proportion of individuals visited the ashdown museum before and after the refurbishment and gave their reviews about the surveys.

Overall most of the people visited after the refurbishment and gave the positive feedback about their survey.

In first table 92,000 people toured the museum year after the amendments while year before that only 74,000 people gone to that sitean year ago.

The feedback of the surveys in the form of pie chart quite improved after the renovation and it showed 35% of the people very satisfied while in previous only 15% people were given this review similarly 40% people were satisfied after as compared to the prior 30% given that reviews. The term dissatisfied gone down from 40 to 15 % while the result of very dissatisfied reduced from 10 to 5 %. The last term of no response remained constant constituted of 5%.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.5
Lexical Resource6.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy6.0
Overall6.5

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The response covers the main features of the data, including the increase in visitor numbers and the shift in satisfaction levels. However, the analysis is somewhat superficial. While you correctly identify the rise in visitor numbers from 74,000 to 92,000 and the positive shift in satisfaction, the report lacks a clear, analytical overview of the trends. The comparison between the two periods is present but could be more effectively integrated. To reach a higher band, ensure that all data points are clearly linked to the trends they represent and provide a more cohesive summary of the overall changes observed.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The response is organized into paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the information. However, the use of cohesive devices is limited and sometimes mechanical. Phrases like 'In first table' and 'The last term' feel slightly disjointed. The progression of ideas is generally logical, but the transition between the visitor numbers and the survey results could be smoother. Improving the variety of linking words (e.g., 'consequently', 'in contrast', 'furthermore') would help the flow of the text and create a more professional, academic tone.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The vocabulary is adequate for the task but lacks precision and variety. You rely on basic terms like 'people', 'gone to', and 'given this review'. There are also some awkward collocations, such as 'amendments' (which usually refers to legal documents) instead of 'refurbishment' or 'renovation'. To improve, try to use more specific vocabulary related to data description, such as 'witnessed an increase', 'a significant shift', or 'remained stable'. The spelling of 'ashdown' should be capitalized as it is a proper noun.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

There are several grammatical errors that occasionally impede the flow of reading. For example, 'proportion of individuals visited' should be 'proportion of individuals who visited', and 'year before that only 74,000 people gone to' should be 'had gone to'. The sentence structure is mostly simple, with limited attempts at complex sentences. Punctuation is also inconsistent, particularly with the use of percentages and capitalization. Focusing on subject-verb agreement and the correct use of tenses (past simple vs. past perfect) will significantly improve your score in this criterion.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.