Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-08-05

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The mixed chart delineates the information about tourist visiting Ashdown Museum while year before it was renovated and the year after it was renovated.

To commence with, It is apparent the pie chart depicts the satisfaction data for both the time period. Evidently, the table shows the number of visitors between before and after of the refurbishment, seventy-four thousand and ninety-two thousand respectively. Noticeably the number of people increased after the Museum is refurbished. Considerably, the highest proportion for dissatisfied is before the renovation (40) while the satisfaction part is only thirty, also even before the renovation there are people who were satisfied (15) and very disappointed is ten, left with, 5 for only no response. On the other hand after the refurbishment the number changed significantly tourist liked the museum by 40 proportion and people who were very satisfied were 35, leaving the disappointed people to 15 and very dissatisfied to 5. Still 5 percent remains constant with no response.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0

The response covers the main features of the data, including the increase in visitor numbers and the shift in satisfaction levels. However, the presentation is somewhat disjointed. While you identify the key figures (74,000 and 92,000), the description of the pie charts is cluttered. You mention specific percentages/proportions without clearly labeling them as such, which makes the data difficult to follow. To improve, ensure you group information logically—perhaps by comparing the visitor numbers first, then contrasting the satisfaction levels—rather than listing figures in a stream-of-consciousness style. The overview is also weak; it lacks a clear summary statement that synthesizes the overall trend.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0

The response is organized into two paragraphs, but the internal flow is problematic. The use of cohesive devices is often mechanical or misused, such as 'To commence with' and 'Considerably' used at the start of sentences where they do not logically fit. The transition between the table data and the pie chart data is abrupt. Additionally, the referencing is sometimes unclear; for instance, 'the satisfaction part is only thirty' lacks context regarding what this figure represents. Improving the use of linking words and ensuring each sentence follows logically from the previous one will significantly enhance the readability of your report.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task but lacks precision and variety. You rely on simple descriptors like 'changed significantly' and 'number of people'. There are also issues with word choice and collocation, such as 'the satisfaction part' and 'very disappointed is ten'. To reach a higher band, you should use more precise terminology related to data description, such as 'proportion', 'category', 'fluctuation', or 'marked increase'. The repetition of basic terms limits the sophistication of the response. Expanding your range of reporting verbs and nouns will help convey the information more professionally.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The response contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but accuracy is inconsistent. There are several grammatical errors, such as 'while year before it was renovated' (missing articles), 'after the Museum is refurbished' (incorrect tense consistency), and 'the number of visitors between before and after of the refurbishment' (awkward phrasing). Punctuation is also inconsistent, with some run-on sentences and misused commas. While the meaning is generally clear, these frequent errors in basic grammar and sentence construction prevent the response from reaching a higher band. Focus on subject-verb agreement and consistent tense usage when describing past data.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.