Band 4.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-08-12

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 4.0)

The Table get see The numbers of Tourists to Ashdown museum during the year before the year after the year after it was finished. The charts see the result of surveys tells visitors how convinces they were with there visit , during the copy two periods.

In The Summary We Get Too See the Total numbers of Visitors to Ashdown Museum . then the other side the Results of surveys of visitor satisfaction . and then they different shade between two pharagraphs . First One is Year before refurbishment and Year after refurbishment . then we get see there are two circles that have different shade between in us .

then we get to see the . During the year before refurbishment is 74,000 and the after refurbishment is 92,000. then before refurbishment very satisfied is 15 and the other one is 35. then satisfied is 30 and the other is 40. then Dissatisfied is 40 and the other will also same. And very dissatisfied is 10 and other side is 5 , and no response is 5 and the other one is also remain same.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 4.0

The response attempts to address the task by describing the data, but it fails to provide a clear summary or highlight the main features effectively. The writing is highly descriptive and repetitive, listing figures rather than synthesizing information or making meaningful comparisons. For instance, phrases like 'then we get to see' and 'the other side' are used instead of analytical language. The response lacks a clear overview, which is essential for an Academic Task 1. While the data points are mentioned, the lack of organization and analytical focus means the task is only partially addressed.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 4.0

The response lacks logical organization. The paragraphing is ineffective, and the progression of ideas is disjointed. There is a heavy reliance on repetitive, informal transitions such as 'then we get to see' and 'and then'. The use of cohesive devices is mechanical and often inaccurate, making the text difficult to follow. The lack of clear topic sentences or a logical flow between the museum visitor numbers and the satisfaction survey results prevents the reader from easily understanding the relationship between the two datasets.

Lexical Resource — Band 4.0

The vocabulary is very limited and often inappropriate for an academic report. There are frequent errors in word choice, such as 'finished' instead of 'refurbished', 'convinces' instead of 'satisfied', and 'different shade' instead of 'distinction'. The student relies on basic, repetitive language and struggles to use terminology relevant to data interpretation. Many words are misused, which occasionally impedes the reader's ability to grasp the intended meaning. A much wider range of vocabulary is required to describe trends and data points accurately.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 4.0

The response contains frequent grammatical errors that often distort meaning. Sentence structures are simple and repetitive, with many run-on sentences and incorrect punctuation. There are significant issues with subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'The Table get see'), word order, and article usage. The lack of control over basic sentence construction makes the text difficult to read. There is no evidence of complex sentence structures, and the high frequency of errors throughout the text significantly impacts the clarity of the report.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.