Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-08-22

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The data illustrates the result of surveys of visitors and the number of people visited the Ashdown Museum during the year pre and post renovation work. Looking at the data, it is readily apparent that number of visitors during the year significantly rose after refurbishment. In addition, the overall number of individuals who were very satisfied also increase steadily.

Visitors in Ashdown Museum were 74000 before the renovation, which surged dramatically to 92000 after the completion of renovation. Moreover, number of people who had no response in satisfaction survey remained stable before and after refurbishment. However, individuals who were very dissatisfied(10) with the museum before renovation fell dramatically to 5 after completion. Furthermore, numbers declined gradually in the category of dissatisfied people. In contrast, number of visitors increased moderately in very satisfied category following the refurbishment from 30 to 40 . Finally, the number of satisfied people to visit museum is accounted for the highest share by the subsequent renovation work.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The student provides a clear overview of the data and includes relevant comparisons, demonstrating a good understanding of the task requirements. However, some key features of the data could have been better highlighted or analyzed. For instance, while the increase in visitor numbers is mentioned, the detailed statistics about satisfaction ratings could be expanded upon for a more comprehensive analysis. Overall, the analysis meets basic expectations but lacks depth in certain areas, which affects holistic understanding of the data set.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The response generally flows well and is easy to follow, with a logical progression. However, there are some awkward phrasings and punctuation issues that disrupt coherence. For instance, 'which surged dramatically to 92000' could be rephrased for clarity. Additionally, proper commas or conjunctions are sometimes missing before transitional phrases, making it harder to follow. These inconsistencies affect the overall cohesion of the text and should be addressed for greater clarity.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary used is mostly appropriate for the task; however, some terms are either vague or incorrectly applied. For example, 'surged dramatically' is a strong phrase but lacks precision in context. Using terms like 'escalated' or 'perked up' could have provided a stronger impression. Additionally, phrases like 'the highest share' could be clarified to indicate specific percentages or data points instead of generalized statements. This would help in presenting a more professional academic tone.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The grammatical range and accuracy are fairly solid, with basic structures correctly used. Nonetheless, there are several instances of missing articles and punctuation errors, such as 'individuals who were very dissatisfied(10)' which should include a space before the parenthesis. The phrase 'number of people who had no response in satisfaction survey remained stable' lacks an article and correct preposition. These errors may cause minor distractions but do not significantly impede understanding overall. Careful proofreading could enhance the grammatical correctness of the response significantly.

Overall feedback

This response shows a foundational understanding of the data presented, particularly regarding trends in visitor satisfaction and numbers which reflects a solid grasp of key points. For improvement, focus on enhancing the depth of analysis, particularly regarding satisfaction metrics, to provide a clearer picture of the implications of these trends. Additionally, refining sentence structures and transitions can elevate the overall fluency and coherence of your writing. Aim for greater precision in your vocabulary choices to better articulate your observations, and ensure grammatical accuracy to bolster your credibility.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.