Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-08-28

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

the graph clearly shows about the satisfaction level of people for both the years .It can be clearly seen that during the year before refurbishment ,the total number of visitors were 74,000.After the refurbishment their is a slight change that is number of visitors have been drastically increased to 92,000 which is a good change.The pie chart for bot the years shows the satisfaction level of the visitors which can be clearly seen as before it was only 15% which increased to 35 i;e for very satisfied ,for satisfied it increases to 40 from 35 and for dissatisfied people reduced to 15 from 40 ,for very dissatisfied reduced to 5 from 10 while no response is equal .this info clearly indicates that after refurbishment the overall experience of the visitors was positively increased and visitors were loving the visit to the new refurbished museam

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.0
Coherence and Cohesion5.0
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.0

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0

The response fails to meet the minimum word count requirement of 150 words, which negatively impacts the score. While you have identified the main features—the increase in visitor numbers and the shift in satisfaction levels—the analysis is somewhat superficial. You have listed the changes in percentages, but the report lacks a clear overview or a more sophisticated synthesis of the data. To improve, ensure you provide a clear summary statement that highlights the overall trend before diving into the specific data points. Additionally, ensure you meet the minimum length requirement to avoid a penalty.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0

The response is written as a single paragraph, which makes it difficult to follow. A well-structured report should have an introduction, an overview, and body paragraphs that group related information logically. The use of cohesive devices is limited and somewhat mechanical (e.g., 'It can be clearly seen that'). To improve, use paragraph breaks to separate your overview from your detailed analysis and employ a wider range of linking words to connect your ideas more fluidly, such as 'consequently,' 'in contrast,' or 'furthermore.'

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task but lacks the precision and variety expected at higher bands. You rely on basic descriptors like 'good change' and 'drastically increased.' There are also some errors in word choice and phrasing, such as 'bot' (typo) and 'no response is equal.' To improve, aim for more precise academic vocabulary to describe trends, such as 'significant growth,' 'a notable shift,' or 'remained constant.' Avoid informal phrasing like 'loving the visit.'

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The response contains several grammatical errors that affect the flow of the text. There are issues with subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'the total number of visitors were') and awkward sentence structures (e.g., 'their is a slight change that is number of visitors have been drastically increased'). Punctuation is also inconsistent, particularly with the use of commas and semicolons. To improve, focus on mastering basic sentence construction and proofreading for common errors like subject-verb agreement and article usage. Incorporating a mix of simple and complex sentences would also help improve your score.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.