Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-09-07

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The pie charts, along with the accompanying table, illustrate the proportion of satisfaction levels and numbers of visitors at Ashdown Museum during the period before and after its refurbishment. Overall, the total number of visitors surged significantly following the renovation. Furthermore, the satisfaction level of visitors improved markedly, with positive feedback dominating the second period. Additionally, the proportion of individuals who gave no response remained constant.

In the year prior to refurbishment, the the total number of visitors stood at 74000, as recorded in the table. Regarding visitor sentiment, dissatisfied visitors accounted for largest share at 40%. while very dissatisfied individuals comprised only 10%. Conversely, satisfied visitors followed closely at 30%, with very satisfied accounted for an additional 15%. Finally, no respondents represented a mere at 5%.

By the year after the renovation, total visitors grew significantly to 92000. The proportion of satisfied visitors experience a rise to 40%. A striking change was observed in very satisfied visitors, which surged to 35%. On the other hand, figures for dissatisfied visitors dropped to 15%. Additionally, very dissatisfied fell to 5%. Lastly, individuals who shows no response remained the same.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 7.0

The response effectively addresses all parts of the task. You have successfully identified the main features, such as the surge in visitor numbers from 74,000 to 92,000 and the significant shift in satisfaction levels. The overview is clear and provides a good summary of the trends. You have made relevant comparisons between the two periods, noting both the increase in positive feedback and the decrease in negative sentiment. The data is accurately reported, and the structure allows for a logical comparison of the 'before' and 'after' states. To reach a higher band, ensure that all data points are integrated into the narrative flow rather than just listing them.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The response is logically organized with a clear introduction, overview, and body paragraphs. You use a range of cohesive devices such as 'Furthermore', 'Conversely', and 'On the other hand' to link ideas effectively. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate the overview from the detailed analysis. However, there are minor issues with punctuation and flow, such as the unnecessary period after 'refurbishment' in the first paragraph and the slightly awkward phrasing in the final sentence. Overall, the progression of information is clear and easy to follow throughout the report.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.5

You demonstrate a good range of vocabulary, using terms like 'surged', 'markedly', 'comprised', and 'striking change' to describe the data. This shows an attempt to use less common lexical items. There are a few minor errors in word choice and collocation, such as 'the the' (repetition) and 'individuals who shows' (subject-verb agreement error affecting lexical accuracy). Additionally, 'no respondents represented a mere at 5%' is slightly awkward. Despite these minor slips, the vocabulary is sufficient to convey the information with precision and flexibility.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, which is appropriate for this task. There are several grammatical errors that slightly detract from the quality, such as 'the the' (repetition), 'satisfied visitors followed closely at 30%, with very satisfied accounted for' (incorrect verb form), and 'individuals who shows' (subject-verb agreement). While these errors are noticeable, they do not impede communication or cause confusion for the reader. To improve, focus on proofreading for subject-verb agreement and ensuring that participial phrases are used correctly.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.