Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-10-01

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Well, This chart shows the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit to Museum during the same two periods.

If we calculate the total visitors during the year before refurbishment is 74000 out of 15% visitors are very satisfied and 30% visitors are gently satisfied and 40% visitors are dissatisfied and 10% visitors are very dissatisfied and 10% visitors gave literally no response.

After all of this calculations the majority is Dissatisfied.

Now the calculation of year after refurbishment 35% of the visitors are very satisfied and 40% visitors are satisfied and 15% visitors are dissatisfied and 5% visitors are very dissatisfied and 5% visitors gave no response.

After measuring all the consequences the satisfaction of visitors are year after refurbishment in which which satisfaction rate is very high than the rate of year before refurbishment and year before refurbishment have 40% dissatisfied rate, on the other hand year after refurbishment have 15% of dissatisfied rate.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

The response makes an attempt to summarise the provided visual data regarding visitor numbers and survey results at Ashdown Museum, yet it only partially addresses the task requirements. While it mentions the visitor totals (74,000 and 92,000 indirectly through calculation phrasing) and some satisfaction percentages, it fails to present a clear, structured overview of the main trends. For instance, the text omits the total visitor number comparison clearly at the beginning and misinterprets the 10% no response figure from the first survey as 'literally no response' alongside minor data confusion. To reach a higher standard, the writer needs to select the most significant features—such as the overall rise in visitor numbers and the significant shift from dissatisfaction to satisfaction post-refurbishment—and present them in an organised manner without getting bogged down in listing every single statistic mechanically.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5

The organisational structure of the response is quite weak and lacks clear overall progression. The writing is broken up into single-sentence blocks rather than cohesive paragraphs, which disrupts the logical flow. Transitional phrases are overly colloquial or repetitive, such as starting sentences with 'If we calculate' or 'After all of this calculations' and 'Now the calculation of year'. Furthermore, cohesive devices are used inadequately; instead of using pronouns or linking words effectively to connect ideas, the writer relies on repeating exact words like 'calculation' and 'year before refurbishment'. To improve, the text needs to be structured into proper paragraphs with a clear introduction, overview, and body details, utilizing a wider and more accurate variety of cohesive markers to guide the reader smoothly through the comparisons.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary used throughout the response is basic, repetitive, and occasionally unnatural, reflecting a limited range suited to a modest band level. The writer frequently relies on simple words like 'show', 'calculate', and 'rate', and misuses terms such as 'gently satisfied' instead of 'satisfied', and 'consequences' instead of 'results' or 'findings'. Additionally, there are awkward phrasing choices like 'gave literally no response'. To achieve a higher lexical score, the student should aim to incorporate a wider variety of precise vocabulary relevant to data reporting, such as verbs like 'rose', 'declined', or 'experienced', and adjectives like 'substantial' or 'considerable' to describe changes, while avoiding conversational filler words.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response displays a very limited range of sentence structures, relying heavily on basic clauses joined by coordinating conjunctions or long, run-on sentences that lack proper punctuation. There are frequent grammatical errors, such as subject-verb agreement issues in 'the total visitors... is 74000 out of 15% visitors are', dangling modifier structures like 'After measuring all the consequences the satisfaction of visitors are year after refurbishment', and messy repetitions like 'in which which satisfaction rate'. These errors frequently cause strain and difficulty for the reader. To improve grammatical performance, the writer should practice constructing simple, error-free sentences before attempting complex structures, paying careful attention to verb tenses, prepositions, and correct punctuation to ensure clarity.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.