Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-10-04

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The table provides total numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum, while the pie charts illustrates the proportions of review on museum from the visitors before and after refurbishment.

Overall, after refurbishment the museum significantly attracted more visitors . Also the satisfaction of the visitors increased dramatically and the percentage of all dissatisfied visitors fell substantially. But the proportion of no respondents remained same as before.

During the year before refurbishment the museum received 74,000 people. Among those people half of them showed dissatisfaction where 40% are dissatisfied visitors and 10% are very dissatisfied visitors. The percentage of the visitors that were satisfied and very satisfied are 30% and 15%, respectively. The visitors who gave no response were 5%

After refurbishment the visitors to the museum increased to 92000 people. The satisfaction of the visitors increased remarkably were 35% of visitors were very satisfied and 40% of visitors were satisfied which covers 75% of the pie chart. In contrast, the proportion of the visitors that showed dissatisfaction fell into 20%. Though the proportion of visitors remained same as before.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

The response successfully addresses all parts of the task by reporting the main features of both the table and the charts, making relevant comparisons between the two periods. An overview is present, highlighting the overall increase in visitor numbers and satisfaction levels. However, some aspects are slightly under-developed; for instance, the specific details regarding satisfaction categories are somewhat repetitive in their delivery. The data is generally accurate, noting the rise from 74,000 to 92,000 visitors and the shifts in survey responses. To reach a higher band, the overview could be more integrated and the selection of key features could be more sharply focused without over-relying on listing every percentage.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a coherent overall arrangement and follows a logical structure, dividing the information into an introduction, an overview, and separate body paragraphs for the two periods. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate the table data from the survey results. However, cohesion is sometimes mechanical or faulty, with transitional phrases like 'In contrast' used slightly awkwardly in the context of the data breakdown. Referencing is generally clear, but the progression within paragraphs could be smoother to avoid a list-like feel. To improve further, the writer should employ a wider range of cohesive devices more naturally and ensure tighter logical links between sentences.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

The student uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, attempting less common items such as 'refurbishment', 'proportion', and 'substantially'. There are, however, some noticeable word choice and collocation inaccuracies, such as 'proportions of review on museum' instead of 'survey results regarding the museum' and writing '92000' without a comma. Spelling is generally accurate, and the errors present do not impede communication. To achieve a higher score, the writer needs to demonstrate more precision in lexical selection and collocation, avoiding awkward phrasing when discussing statistical data.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

The response features a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, demonstrating a decent attempt at structuring sentences, such as using introductory subordinate clauses. There are, however, some recurring grammar errors in tense consistency, subject-verb agreement, and prepositions, such as 'the charts illustrates' instead of 'illustrate' and 'where 40% are dissatisfied' mixing past and present tenses. Punctuation is sometimes missing, particularly around lists and clauses. These errors rarely impede communication, but they place the response firmly in this band. To improve, the writer must exercise better control over complex sentence structures and ensure grammatical consistency throughout.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.