Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-10-07

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The given table illustrates the total amount of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and after the refurbishment. Also, the corresponding pie charts depicts the ratio of visitors satisfaction in terms of numbers in different section such as very satisfied, satisfied, dissatisfied, very dissatisfied and no response.

Overall, it is clear that the table describes the huge difference in numbers, however after the refurbishment shows the highest ratio. Furthermore, the corresponding pie chart compares the results of visitors satisfaction in two years period

Firstly, the table describes the total amount of peoples that visited Ashdown Museum in two years, but after the refurbishment shows big numbers which is about 92,000 peoples. While, before refurbishment gives the lowest amount of visitors in Museum which is approximately 74,000 visitors. Secondly, the corresponding pie chart describes the total ratio of visitors satisfactions. but year before refurbish dissatisfied has the highest numbers which is 40 as compared to year after refurbishment which is 15. Lastly, the year before refurbish shows less numbers about 30 as compared to after the refurbish which is 40.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You identify the main comparison in visitor numbers, reporting 74,000 before and 92,000 after refurbishment, and correctly note that dissatisfaction fell from 40% to 15%, while satisfaction rose from 30% to 40%. However, the overview is unclear: “the highest ratio” does not specify which measure increased, and the response does not summarise the overall shift from mostly dissatisfied visitors to mostly satisfied ones. Several important survey figures are omitted, including the rise in “very satisfied” responses from 15% to 35%; “very dissatisfied” also fell from 10% to 5%, while no response remained at 5%. The final comparison is incomplete because it gives only the satisfied figures without clearly naming the category. More precise selection and reporting of the key trends would make the summary more complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has a basic paragraph structure: an introduction, an attempted overview, and a body paragraph covering the table and charts. It also uses sequencing words such as “Firstly,” “Secondly,” and “Lastly.” However, progression is limited because the overview does not clearly state the main trends, and the body moves between visitor totals and satisfaction categories without a clear grouping or comparison pattern. Some linking is mechanical, while “however” is used where the relationship between ideas is not a contrast. The final sentence is also difficult to follow because “less numbers” is not explicitly connected to the satisfied category. Organise the body around the visitor total and then the main satisfaction changes, using clear references and links between each comparison.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some task-related vocabulary, including “refurbishment,” “dissatisfied,” and “satisfied,” so the reader can generally identify the subject of the report. However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate or repetitive. For example, “total amount of visitors” and “total amount of peoples” are not natural ways to describe visitor counts; “ratio” is also unsuitable for these percentages. Phrases such as “big numbers” and “less numbers” are vague, and “visitors satisfactions” is an awkward form. These choices sometimes make the intended comparison less clear. Use precise terms such as “number of visitors,” “proportion of respondents,” and “percentage,” and vary the language used to describe increases and decreases.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response attempts some longer sentence forms, including clauses introduced by “however” and “which,” but control is inconsistent and the range remains limited. Errors in agreement and sentence construction occur in examples such as “the corresponding pie charts depicts” and “after the refurbishment shows the highest ratio.” There are also problems with articles, plurals, and punctuation, including “in two years period” and the lower-case “but” after a full stop. Some sentences are fragments or have unclear relationships between clauses, particularly “While, before refurbishment gives the lowest amount…” These errors can make the comparisons harder to follow. Practise building accurate simple sentences first, then combine them with controlled contrast clauses and check subject–verb agreement and sentence boundaries.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.