Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-10-07

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The bar graphs illustrate the percentage breakdown of visitors satisfaction, when they visit Ashdown Museum during the year before and after it was refurbished. While, table provides data about the total number of visitors.

Overall, Ashdown Museum attracted numerous visitors, although after refurbishment the visitors figure remained dominant. Meanwhile, the result of survey presented the largest share for dissatisfaction of visitors before reburbishment, lately after refurbishment this proportion decreases simultaneously.

Looking at the details, almost 74000 people visited Ashdown Museum before refurbishment. However, this figure slightly rose to 92000 after refurbishment. Whereas, the conducted survey before refurbishment demonstrates the highest proportion of 40%, people dissatisfied with visit, which is followed by satisfaction of visitors approximately 30%. The neglibile proportion of 5% visitors projected no response.

Turning to the the remaing details of after refurbishment, which observed that 40% of visitors are satisfied, and 35% expressed very satisfied. Contrastly, to the dissatisfaction category that decreased marginally from 40% before refurbishment to 15% after refurbishment. Finally, merely 5% of visitors expressed no response and very dissatisfied.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

You cover both the visitor totals and the satisfaction surveys, and the main comparisons are generally accurate: attendance rose from 74,000 to 92,000, while dissatisfaction fell from 40% to 15% and satisfaction increased. Your overview identifies the key shift from dissatisfaction before refurbishment to greater satisfaction afterwards. The response also includes relevant figures to support these points. However, the overview is not fully precise: saying the visitor figure “remained dominant” does not clearly explain the increase, and “numerous visitors” is too general to convey the comparison. You also omit the 10% who were very dissatisfied before refurbishment and do not clearly distinguish the two satisfaction categories in the overview. A sharper summary of the overall changes would make the key features more fully developed.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear four-paragraph structure, moving from an introduction and overview to details for each period. This gives the information a generally logical progression, and phrases such as “Looking at the details” and “Turning to” help signal shifts. The comparisons are also grouped sensibly by year. However, some linking is mechanical or awkward: “Whereas” begins a fragment, while “Contrastly, to the dissatisfaction category” does not connect the comparison grammatically. The overview’s “Meanwhile” relationship is also unclear, and “the remaining details” is an imprecise reference. To strengthen cohesion, use fewer formulaic transitions and connect each comparison directly, with clear references to the relevant year and category.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a reasonable range of task-related vocabulary, including “percentage breakdown,” “proportion,” “dissatisfied,” and “refurbishment,” so the reader can follow the main comparisons. There are also attempts at more formal reporting language, such as “conducted survey” and “expressed.” However, inaccurate word choice and collocation are noticeable and sometimes make the meaning less natural: “visitors figure remained dominant,” “satisfaction of visitors,” and “projected no response” are not appropriate expressions here. Spelling errors such as “reburbishment,” “neglibile,” and “remaing” also reduce control. Aim for precise, natural combinations such as “the number of visitors,” “visitors were satisfied,” and “gave no response,” and check spelling carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and more complex sentence forms, including clauses introduced by “although,” “which,” and “while.” Some sentences communicate the data clearly, particularly the statement that the visitor total rose from 74,000 to 92,000. However, several structures are faulty, and these errors sometimes make relationships between ideas difficult to follow. For example, “Whereas, the conducted survey…” is an incomplete clause, and “Turning to the the remaining details … which observed that” lacks a clear grammatical subject. There are also problems with articles, punctuation, and sentence construction, as in “when they visit Ashdown Museum” and “Contrastly, to the dissatisfaction category.” Build complete sentences around each comparison and check clause structure, tense, and punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.