Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-10-08

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The diagrams compare the proportion of visitors to Ashdown museum . this diagrams also shows how many visitor visit museum before and after refurbishment to the Ashdown museum.

During the year before refurbishment, people dissatisfied with this museum at 40% and very dissatisfied people was nearly 10% so dissatisfied people higher than satisfied people. People satisfied and very satisfied at 30% and 15%. however, more people not intersted in this museum so they cannot respone with number of people 5%.

During the year after refurbishment people opinion almost change. the process ends people very satisfied and satisfied number with 35% and 40%. now, numbers of people dissatisfied and very dissatisfied almost change number with 15% and 5%. people respone after refurbishment also same with before at 5%.

overall, the number of people visit in museum change after refurbishment with 92000 visitor. Before,refurbishment that was only 74000 visitors visit the Ashdown museum.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You cover both the visitor totals and the satisfaction surveys, and the figures you report match the data: attendance rose from 74,000 to 92,000, while dissatisfaction fell from 40% to 15% and satisfaction increased. The main contrast between the two survey periods is clear, and you include the unchanged 5% with no response. However, the overview is not stated clearly at the beginning; the final paragraph mentions attendance growth but does not summarise the broad shift from mostly dissatisfied visitors to mostly satisfied ones. Some details are also unclear, such as “more people not interested,” which misinterprets the no-response category. A concise overview highlighting the two main trends would make the response more complete and precise.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, a paragraph about the first survey, one about the second, and a final comparison of visitor numbers. This gives the information an overall coherent arrangement. You also use basic links such as “however,” “During the year after refurbishment,” and “overall” to signal contrasts and sequence. At times, though, the progression is weakened by unclear or mechanical connections. For example, “the process ends” does not clearly introduce the post-refurbishment results, and the final paragraph shifts back to attendance without linking that increase to the survey changes. Use a clear overview before the details, then group comparable satisfaction categories and connect the attendance figures to the main trends.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use relevant task vocabulary, including “refurbishment,” “dissatisfied,” “satisfied,” “proportion,” and “visitors,” so the reader can identify the subject and most categories. However, the range and control are limited, with repeated wording such as “people” and “number,” and several inaccurate or unnatural expressions. “People not interested in this museum” does not accurately describe visitors who gave no response, while “the process ends” is unsuitable for describing survey results. Spelling errors such as “respone” and “intersted” also reduce precision. Aim for concise reporting language and accurate category labels—for example, “the share of visitors who were dissatisfied” and “those who gave no response”—rather than repeating general terms.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

You attempt both simple statements and longer comparisons, and the reader can generally understand the main figures. Some sentence forms are nevertheless inaccurate, particularly with articles, agreement, and verb patterns. For example, “this diagrams also shows” has a mismatch between the demonstrative, noun, and verb, while “people very satisfied and satisfied number with 35% and 40%” lacks a clear grammatical structure. Tense and phrasing are also inconsistent in “people opinion almost change.” Punctuation and capitalisation need attention, including the lower-case sentence openings and spaces before full stops. Build reliable sentences such as “The proportion who were satisfied rose to 40%” before attempting longer comparisons, and check subject–verb agreement and articles.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.