Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-10-09

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The table indicates the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum before and after its refurbished that indicates their satisfaction level through surveys during the same two periods.

The first Table shows the total number of visitors to the Museum before and after the refurbishment and that indicate a sharp increase of visitors after its refurbishment that inshore that after the renovation people admire more to visit newly structured and afirmative museum.

While, the second table indicates the surveys result of visitors satisfaction that indicate there the very satisfied level was decreased steeply and satisfied level increases while diastatisfaction level decreases gradually else disatisfaction level and no response just remain a bit same.

Overall, these tables shows the after the refurbishedment there was a large icrease in visitors attracted towards the museum and peple mostly get satisfied through the new renovation according to the results of the surveys after the year.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You identify the main overall pattern: visitor numbers rose after refurbishment, and satisfaction improved. However, the account is only partly developed because it gives no figures and misreports an important survey trend. The proportion who were very satisfied increased from 15% to 35%, rather than decreasing; satisfaction overall rose, while dissatisfaction fell. The response also says dissatisfaction decreased “gradually,” although the chart gives two periods and shows a marked fall in dissatisfied responses from 40% to 15%. To strengthen the report, include the visitor totals (74,000 and 92,000), compare the main satisfaction categories with accurate percentages, and distinguish dissatisfied from very dissatisfied. The overview is relevant, but the supporting details are too limited and unclear.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

There is a basic overall structure: the response introduces the visuals, discusses visitor numbers and survey results, and ends with a summary. This gives the reader some sense of organisation. However, progression within the paragraphs is weak, and the repeated pattern of “indicates” makes the account feel mechanical. The opening and first body section repeat the same point about the table, while “While” begins a sentence without a clear contrast or a complete connection to the previous idea. The final overview also repeats earlier claims rather than bringing the key comparisons together. Organise the response into a concise introduction, a clear overview, and detail paragraphs grouped by visitor totals and satisfaction results; use linking words only where they express a genuine relationship.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The response uses some task-related vocabulary, including “visitors,” “satisfaction,” “surveys,” and “refurbishment,” so the topic is generally recognisable. However, the range is limited and several inaccurate or misspelled choices make meaning difficult to follow: “inshore,” “affirmative museum,” “diastatisfaction,” and “refurbishedment.” Some phrases are also unnatural, such as “people admire more to visit” and “satisfied level.” Aim for precise chart language and accurate word forms, for example, “the number of visitors increased” and “the proportion who were satisfied.” Avoid repeating “indicates” and use a small range of accurate alternatives such as “shows,” “rose,” and “fell.” Proofreading spelling and collocation would make your comparisons clearer.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt to combine ideas in longer sentences, but these structures are often faulty, and the response relies on a narrow range of sentence patterns. For example, “The first Table shows … and that indicate” has unclear clause structure and subject–verb disagreement; “While, the second table indicates…” is an incomplete or awkwardly connected construction. There are also recurring problems with articles, agreement, and sentence boundaries, as in “these tables shows.” These errors sometimes make relationships between ideas hard to understand. Practise writing shorter, complete sentences first, then add controlled comparisons using structures such as “Visitor numbers rose from … to …, while the share of dissatisfied visitors fell.” Check that each subject agrees with its verb and that each sentence has a clear main clause.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.