Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-10-09

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The table chart illustrates the figure to visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and after refurbishment. The chart compares the result of surveys of visitors satisfaction,during the same two periods.

Overall,the most noticeable feature is that the figure for visitors to Ashdown museum after refurbishmenr was considerably higher than that for the other categories in survey of visitors satisfaction.

In detail,the number of visitors to Ashdown Museum after refurbihment was higher than that for before refurbishment. After refurbishment accounted for the highest figure at 92,000, while visitors to Ahsdown Museum before refurbishment stood at 74,000.

It is further apparent that the result of surveys of visitors who are satisfied before rfurbishment accounted for at 30,whereas after refurbishment who are satisfied from30 to 40. In contrast,visitors who are dissatisfied approximately 40 and before refurbishment it reached at only 10. Moreover, visitors whoare very satisfied and give norepose at just 5 and 15 respectively.

Furthermore,visitors who are dissatisfied,very dissatisfied and give no response at approximately 15,5,and 5 respectively. Considerably,visitors who are very satisfied at 35.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You include both the visitor totals and survey results, and the figures of 74,000 and 92,000 are reported accurately. You also identify the broad improvement in satisfaction after refurbishment, including the rise in the “very satisfied” share to 35 and the fall in dissatisfaction to 15. However, the overview is unclear: it compares the visitor total with “other categories in survey” rather than summarising the main survey changes. Some details are misreported or difficult to interpret. Before refurbishment, 40% were dissatisfied and 10% very dissatisfied, but the response reverses these figures; it also gives 15 and 5 for “very satisfied” and “no response” without clearly assigning them. State the key contrasts accurately and distinguish the two periods throughout.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5

The response has separate paragraphs for an introduction, overview and details, and it attempts to organise information with phrases such as “Overall,” “In detail” and “Furthermore.” This gives the reader some sense of structure. However, progression is weak because the overview does not clearly summarise the survey trends, and the final two paragraphs repeat or fragment information rather than developing a clear comparison. Several links are confusing, especially “In contrast” before the figures for dissatisfaction and “Moreover” before the figures for very satisfied and no response. Group the data by period or by positive and negative responses, and use clear references such as “before refurbishment” and “after refurbishment” in each comparison.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some task-relevant vocabulary, including “refurbishment,” “visitors,” “satisfied” and “dissatisfied,” and you attempt to vary expressions with “considerably higher” and “accounted for.” However, word choice and collocation are often inaccurate or repetitive, which sometimes makes the meaning hard to follow. For example, “the figure to visitors” is not a natural way to describe visitor numbers, and “accounted for at 30” is awkward. There are also noticeable spelling errors, including “refurbihment,” “Ahsdown” and “norepose.” Use precise terms such as “visitor numbers,” “the proportion of respondents” and “stood at,” and check spelling carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt a mixture of sentence forms, including a comparison with “whereas” and a contrast introduced by “while.” However, many sentences contain errors in structure, articles, agreement or punctuation, and these sometimes obscure the intended comparison. For instance, “the result of surveys of visitors who are satisfied before refurbishment accounted for at 30” has an unclear subject and faulty verb pattern; “after refurbishment who are satisfied from30 to 40” is not a complete grammatical clause. Commas are frequently attached to the following word, and spacing around figures is inconsistent. Build shorter, complete sentences first, then add accurate comparison clauses, for example: “The satisfied share rose from 30% to 40%.”

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.