Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-10-09

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The table illustrates the populations of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts illustrate the result of surveys asking visitors how contented they wew with their visit, during the sametwo periods.

Generally, the total number of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before refurbishment is lower than that of the year after refurbishment. The year before refurbishment has the highest number of dissatisfied followed by satisfied and the least of it is no response while year after refurbishment has the highest number of satisfied followed by very satisfied and the least of it are very dissatisfied and no response.

In details, the year before refurbishment total number of visitors to Ashdown Museum is 74,000 while the year after refurbishment is 92,000 which is higher than that of year before refurbishment. The highest number of visitors in year before refurbishment is 40 by dissatisfied while the lowest is 5 by no resonse while the highest number of visitors in year after refurbishment is 40 by satisfied while the lowest are 5 by very dissatisfied and no response.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You identify the main overall change: visitor numbers rose from 74,000 to 92,000 after refurbishment, and you compare the satisfaction patterns in both periods. Several key figures are also reported accurately, including 40% dissatisfied before refurbishment and 40% satisfied afterwards. However, the response only partially covers the survey data: it omits the increase in very satisfied visitors from 15% to 35% and does not clearly report that dissatisfaction fell from 40% to 15%. Calling these percentages “numbers of visitors” also confuses survey proportions with visitor totals. The overview gives some relevant comparisons, but the main changes are not selected and summarised fully. A clearer overview and more precise reporting of the most important shifts would strengthen the response.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5

The response has a basic structure, moving from an introduction to an overview and then to details, so the reader can identify the two periods being compared. However, progression is limited because the final paragraph largely repeats the overview rather than adding a well-organised comparison. Linking is also repetitive: “while” is used to contrast the visitor totals and the satisfaction results, and several clauses are joined into long sentences without clear separation. Phrases such as “the highest number … followed by” make the comparisons harder to follow because the categories are not consistently grouped. Organise the details by period or by positive and negative satisfaction, and use clearer sentence boundaries and reference to guide the reader.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant task vocabulary, including “refurbished,” “dissatisfied,” “satisfied,” and “total number of visitors,” which allows the main subject to be understood. However, the range is limited and some choices are inaccurate or repetitive. “Populations of visitors” is not a natural way to describe visitor totals, while “contented” is less suitable than the chart’s satisfaction terminology. The repeated phrase “highest number of visitors” is also misleading when describing percentages of survey respondents. There are noticeable spelling and typing errors, including “wew,” “sametwo,” and “resonse,” which reduce accuracy. Use precise terms such as “proportion of respondents” and vary comparison language while retaining the chart’s categories.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple statements and longer comparisons, and the reader can generally understand the intended meaning. However, the range of sentence structures is limited, and longer sentences are often difficult to control. For example, “The year before refurbishment has the highest number … while year after refurbishment has…” lacks consistent article use and creates an awkward, overloaded comparison. In “the least of it is no response,” the pronoun reference and sentence construction are unclear. The response also shifts between present and past forms when describing the periods, such as “is lower” and “was refurbished.” Use consistent past-tense reporting and build comparisons in shorter, grammatically complete sentences; check articles and agreement when naming each year.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.