Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-10-09

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The table chart illustrated the number of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished, while pie charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same years.

Overall, after refurbishment the total number of visitors to Ashdown Mesume was increased as compared with before refurbishment. In contrast, results of surveys of visitors was accounted similar by no response. After refurbishment, the largest proportion shared by very dissatisfied.

To begin with, before refurbishment the total number of visitors visit to Ashdown Museum was accounted 74,000, whereas, it increased to 92,000 after refurbishment of Museum. Turning to result surveys of visitors satisfaction chart, year before refurbishment. 40 people contributed by dissatisfied, followed by 30 for satisfied, half of that was consumed by very satisfied people at 15. Furthrmore, 10 people were satisfied by before it gone in refurbishment and remaining 5 were from no response.

In addition, after the refurbishment of Museum, the proportion of dissatisfied at 15, it decreased from earlier. Moreover, the proportion of very satisfied people was more the twice in after refurbishment, at 35. However, very dissatisfied was decreased to 5, followed by 40 of satisfied.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You cover both the visitor totals and the satisfaction surveys, and the figures you report are mostly accurate: visitors rose from 74,000 to 92,000, while dissatisfaction fell from 40% to 15% and very satisfied responses rose from 15% to 35%. However, the overview is unclear and includes a major misreading: you say the largest proportion after refurbishment was “very dissatisfied,” when it was satisfied, at 40%. The statement that survey results were “accounted similar by no response” is also unclear; no response remained at 5% in both years. Some details are expressed imprecisely, such as “40 people” rather than 40% of respondents. A clearer overview identifying the main shifts would make the report more complete and accurate.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, an overview and separate paragraphs for the two periods, and you use linking expressions such as “whereas,” “In addition” and “However.” Nevertheless, progression is weakened by unclear or incomplete sentences, including “Turning to result surveys of visitors satisfaction chart, year before refurbishment,” which does not form a complete thought. Some connections are also awkward or repetitive, and the overview’s contrast between visitor numbers and survey results is difficult to follow. Organise the survey figures consistently—for example, compare each satisfaction category across the two years—and use clear topic sentences and references. This would create a more coherent progression rather than a sequence of loosely connected figures.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some task-relevant vocabulary, including “refurbishment,” “proportion,” “dissatisfied” and “increased,” so the reader can identify the topic and many comparisons. However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate enough to make parts difficult to understand. Examples include “the largest proportion shared by very dissatisfied,” “40 people contributed by dissatisfied” and “10 people were satisfied by before it gone in refurbishment.” “Table chart” and “pie charts” are also imprecise labels for the visuals. Aim for standard reporting phrases such as “accounted for,” “the proportion of respondents” and “rose/fell to.” Check spelling as well, including “Mesume” and “Furthrmore.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt some longer sentences and use comparison structures, as in “whereas, it increased to 92,000,” but control is inconsistent. Errors in verb forms, agreement, articles and sentence construction occur frequently: “the total number … was increased,” “results of surveys … was accounted similar,” and “after refurbishment of Museum” are examples. The fragment “Turning to result surveys of visitors satisfaction chart, year before refurbishment” also shows difficulty forming complete sentences. These problems sometimes make the intended relationship between figures unclear. Practise accurate simple reporting patterns first, such as “The number increased from X to Y” and “The proportion of dissatisfied visitors fell to X%,” then combine them with clauses using “while” or “whereas.”

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.