Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-10-09

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The table illustrates the number of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after refurbished. The graph demonstrates the output obtained from surveys asking tourists how satisfied they were with their visits during the two periods.

Overall, the total number of tourists during the hear before refurbishment were at 74,000 with majority of the visitors showing their dissatisfaction. In contrast, the number spiked to 92,000 during the year after it was refurbished and it also recorded satisfactorily responses from most of the visitors.

During the year before refurbishment, the data obtained from tourists demonstrated that 40% of visitors were dissatisfied with the Museumand only 30% were satisfied while 10% were very dissatisfied. 15% were very dissatisfied and finally no response were gotten from the remaining 5%.

On the other hand, the year after refurbishment experienced a significant growth of tourists with 40% of visitors expressing their satisfaction, 35% were very satisfied, 15% dissatisfied, while the remaining 10% was equally shared between dissatisfaction and no responses.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You cover the main features by reporting the rise in visitors from 74,000 to 92,000 and the shift from predominantly dissatisfied responses before refurbishment to more positive responses afterwards. Most survey figures are accurate, including the 40% dissatisfied and 30% satisfied before, and 40% satisfied and 35% very satisfied after. However, there is an important misreading: before refurbishment, 15% were very satisfied, not very dissatisfied; the latter figure was 10%. The final description of the post-refurbishment 10% is also unclear, since it combines 5% very dissatisfied with 5% no response. The overview identifies the broad change, but clearer, more precise reporting of these categories would make the account more complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, an overview, and separate paragraphs for the two periods. This makes the comparison easy to follow, and transitions such as “In contrast” and “On the other hand” help signal the change. However, the progression within the data paragraphs is not always smooth. In the pre-refurbishment paragraph, “15% were very dissatisfied” conflicts with the earlier figure and disrupts the sequence of categories. The final sentence also groups two distinct categories together rather than reporting them separately. Use a consistent order for satisfaction categories in both periods and connect each figure clearly to its label to make cohesion more precise.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a reasonable range of task-related vocabulary, including “refurbishment,” “dissatisfied,” “significant growth,” and “expressing their satisfaction.” These choices communicate the general comparison, but some wording is inaccurate or unnatural for describing charts. “The graph demonstrates the output obtained” is an awkward way to introduce survey results, while “satisfactorily responses” uses the wrong form and “tourists” is less precise than “visitors” in this context. There are also spelling and spacing slips, such as “hear” and “Museumand.” Aim for accurate, natural collocations and use the chart’s own category labels consistently; this would improve precision without requiring more elaborate vocabulary.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex forms, including the contrastive overview sentence beginning “In contrast” and the longer sentence listing survey results. The main message remains understandable, but some grammatical errors affect accuracy. For example, “the year before and the year after refurbished” is missing a passive construction (“was refurbished”), and “the number … were” has a subject–verb agreement problem. In “with majority of the visitors,” an article is needed, while “no response were gotten” has agreement and awkward passive construction. The final sentence also shifts between “40% … expressing” and “35% were,” making the structure uneven. Check agreement, articles, and parallel forms when presenting figures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.