Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-10-10

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The illustrated table demonstrated the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and after the refurbished.Similarly ,the given charts display the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit , during those two periods.

In my overview,the numbers of visitors who didnot respond about the refurbished of Ashdown Museum was similar in both years . After redesigned it can be seen that the number of visitors rose by more numbers.

To begin with the above table , it can be observed that 74000 of visitors came to visit this museum. Howerver , after the mangonized the number of visitors rose by 18000 more in the comparison of before.

Furthermore,from the above charts 15% of visitors were very satisfied before redesigned and after rebuilted 35% of visitors were very satisfied with their plans to manage this museum.With the comparison of the development of museum it can be seenthat thera was more numbers of visitors who were dissatisfied before mangonized and it covered 40% which was the highest number among others.Before remanagement of Ashdown Museum 30 %of visitors were satisfied but it incresed by 10% after it.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You identify the main visitor total accurately: it rose from 74,000 to 92,000, and you report several satisfaction figures correctly, including very satisfied visitors increasing from 15% to 35% and satisfied visitors rising from 30% to 40%. However, the response only partially covers the visual information. The overview focuses on non-response, which remained at 5% in both years, but misses the clearest overall change: satisfaction improved while dissatisfaction declined. The after-refurbishment figures for dissatisfied and very dissatisfied visitors are not reported, and the 10% figure for very dissatisfied visitors before refurbishment is also omitted. Some descriptions, such as “rose by more numbers,” are unclear. Select the main contrasts and summarise them explicitly in the overview.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has a basic paragraph structure, moving from an introduction and overview to details about the table and charts. Linking expressions such as “To begin with” and “Furthermore” help signal new points. However, progression is not consistently clear: the overview’s focus on non-response is not developed, and the final paragraph shifts between satisfaction categories without a clear order or complete comparison of the two years. Some transitions are awkward or repetitive, including “With the comparison” and repeated references to the museum’s refurbishment. Organise the details by visual or by contrasting before and after, and use clear references such as “the proportion of dissatisfied visitors” so readers can follow each comparison.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

You use some task-relevant vocabulary, including “visitors,” “satisfied,” “dissatisfied,” and “rose,” so the main subject is generally recognisable. However, the range is limited and several inaccurate or unnatural choices make parts difficult to understand. “Mangonized,” “rebuilted,” and “remanagement” do not express refurbishment appropriately, while “rose by more numbers” is not a natural way to describe an increase. There are also spelling errors such as “Howerver,” “incresed,” and “seenthat.” Use precise, repeated chart language rather than attempting uncertain synonyms: for example, “refurbished,” “the number of visitors increased,” and “the proportion of dissatisfied visitors fell.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a comparison introduced by “but” and a clause beginning “who were dissatisfied.” However, control is inconsistent, and errors sometimes make relationships between ideas hard to follow. For example, “after the mangonized the number of visitors rose” has a faulty clause structure, while “after redesigned 35% of visitors were very satisfied” is missing a grammatical subject or passive form. Articles and prepositions are also unreliable, as in “during the year before and after the refurbished” and “in the comparison of before.” Punctuation spacing is inconsistent. Build accurate simple sentences first, then add comparisons using patterns such as “After the refurbishment, the figure increased from 15% to 35%.”

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.