Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-10-11

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The table campares the number of visitors to Ashdown Meseum during the year before its refurbishment and the year after it. Where as bar charts illustrate the cunclusion of survey asking visitors that how satisfied they were during their visit, during the same two periods.

Overall their is increase in total visitors to Ashdown Museum when the refurbishment is done. Furthermore reviews was some positive and negative as people moslty was dissatisfied before the renovation, but after their view changes as most population who visit their were satisfied.

Initially, their was abot 74000 active visitors during the year but after its renovation it number increases. During the survey on the same year before its refurbishmet most people was unsatisfied as 35-40 percent people was those who were extremely dissatisfied, only 10-15 percent people was happy with old infrastructure, where as 5% people do not participate in survey.

On the otherhand, After renovation data changes, as most of the people (up to 35-40%)were happy and fully satisfied with the changes. where as few do not like advancement which accounts for 15 percent, and 5 percent of people do not participate in giving reviews.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You cover both the visitor totals and the satisfaction surveys, and your overview identifies the main shifts: attendance rose after refurbishment, while responses became more positive. Several figures are broadly accurate, including 74,000 visitors before, the 35–40% satisfied after, and 5% giving no response in each period. However, the account of the earlier survey is unclear and partly inaccurate: 35–40% were dissatisfied, not “extremely dissatisfied”; only 10% were very dissatisfied, while 15% were very satisfied and 30% satisfied. The after-refurbishment description also groups the two positive categories rather than reporting them separately. To strengthen the response, distinguish each category accurately and make the key comparisons more explicit.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, an overview, and separate paragraphs for the two periods. This helps the reader follow the broad before-and-after comparison. Linking expressions such as “Overall,” “Initially,” and “On the other hand” signal the stages of the report, although some transitions feel mechanical or are not used precisely. For example, “On the otherhand” introduces the post-refurbishment data, but the preceding paragraph already discusses the earlier period without a clear comparison between corresponding categories. Some references, such as “their view changes,” are also vague. Organise the details around positive and negative responses across both years, and use clearer references and comparisons to create smoother progression.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant task vocabulary, including “refurbishment,” “survey,” “dissatisfied,” and “infrastructure,” and the reader can generally understand the intended comparisons. However, spelling errors and imprecise or unnatural word choices are noticeable, including “campares,” “Meseum,” “cunclusion,” and “advancement.” Phrases such as “active visitors” and “people do not participate in survey” do not accurately or naturally describe the data; the latter refers to respondents who gave no response. Repetition of “people” and “happy” also limits precision. Build a more reliable set of chart-reporting expressions, such as “visitor numbers,” “survey responses,” and “the proportion who were satisfied,” and check spelling carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including a contrast with “whereas” and a time clause beginning “when.” However, errors in agreement, verb forms, articles, and sentence construction are frequent enough to make some sentences awkward or difficult to interpret. Examples include “their is increase,” “reviews was,” “most people was,” and “it number increases.” The opening sentence also has an unclear construction in “survey asking visitors that how satisfied they were.” Work on matching subjects and verbs, using past tense consistently for the two completed periods, and forming indirect questions without “that” (“asking visitors how satisfied they were”). More accurate sentence patterns would make your comparisons much clearer.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.