Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-10-11

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The given table and pie chart depicts the total number of visitors and the survey results on the level of satisfaction respectively in the Ashdown Museum before and after refurbishment.

Overall, it's evident that the number visitors tremendously increased and the level of satisfaction gradually spiked after renewal of the museum. People who didn't state any response remains the same, 5%, at both stages.

From the table, it gives a clear picture that, in the following year after refurbishment, the number of visitors at the Ashdown Museum increased by almost by 20,000, that is, the number people visited before renewal was 74,000 and after, it increased to 92,000.

Compared to the level of satisfaction, the survey clearly represents the reversal of the level of satisfaction among people.The percentage of people who voted very satisfied before renewal of the museum was 15, which was increased by 20 contributing to 35 after renewal. At the same time the percent of response to very dissatisfied decreased by half after renewal in comparison with before renewal (5 and 10 respectively). Similarly, the same trend was visible with the level of satisfaction and dissatifaction. Before it was 35:5 and after renewal it turned out to 40:15.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You cover both the visitor total and the satisfaction surveys, and your overview identifies the main direction of change: attendance rose while satisfaction improved. The figures for visitors and for “very satisfied” and “very dissatisfied” are reported accurately. However, the overview could be more precise about the full pattern: dissatisfaction fell substantially, while the “satisfied” category rose from 30% to 40%. The final comparison is unclear and inaccurate: “Before it was 35:5 and after renewal it turned out to 40:15” does not match the chart’s satisfaction/dissatisfaction figures. Develop the comparison by naming each category and its values, rather than using an unexplained ratio. This would make the account more complete and precise.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, an overview, and separate paragraphs for visitor numbers and survey results. This gives the reader a coherent route through the information. Linking phrases such as “Overall,” “From the table,” and “At the same time” help signal relationships, although some transitions feel formulaic. The final sentence is the main cohesion problem: “Before it was 35:5 and after renewal it turned out to 40:15” leaves the reader unsure which categories the figures represent, and it conflicts with the earlier figures. Use explicit references such as “the satisfied share” and “the dissatisfied share,” and group the survey comparisons in a consistent order. That would make progression clearer and cohesion less dependent on generic linkers.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use a reasonable range of task-related vocabulary, including “refurbishment,” “survey,” “percentage,” and “increased,” and the meaning is generally understandable. There are also attempts at more descriptive wording, such as “reversal” and “spiked,” but these are not always precise or natural for describing chart data. “The level of satisfaction gradually spiked” is awkward, while “the number visitors” and “the number people visited” show inaccurate phrasing. The spelling “dissatifaction” is also an error. Aim for accurate, conventional collocations and vary them carefully: for example, say that visitor numbers “rose” and satisfaction “improved,” then refer to the “proportion of respondents” in each category. This would improve precision without requiring more elaborate vocabulary.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a comparison with “which” and a sentence beginning “Compared to the level of satisfaction.” Most of the intended meaning can be followed, but some grammatical errors recur. The opening has subject–verb disagreement (“table and pie chart depicts”), and “the number visitors” is missing “of.” In “People who didn't state any response remains,” the plural subject requires “remain.” The phrase “increased by almost by 20,000” also contains an unnecessary repeated preposition, and “which was increased by 20” uses an unsuitable passive form. Check agreement, articles and prepositions, and use direct active constructions such as “the proportion rose from 15% to 35%.” More consistently accurate sentences would strengthen the response.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.