Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-10-12

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The table chart depicts the informatipn regarding the figure of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished, and the table chart compares information regarding the result of surveys asking people how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

Overall, it can be observed that the number of people who visited a Ashdown Museum increased after refurbishment and people were very satisfied after refurbishment.

Looking at the details, 74,000 individuals visited the Ashdown Museum before the restoration, this figure increased by 18,000 after refurbishment, total number accounted for 92,000. In contrast, the result of surveys shows 35% people were very satisfied after the restoration, before renovation it were 15%. This is followed by satisfied, 30% individuals satified previously renovation, later percentage of satified people increased by 10%. Interestingly number of dissatisfied visitors decreased after development, 15% individuals dissatisfied.

Moving further, The proportion of dissatisfied people fell by half after refurbishment and no response perventage figure remain same as before development.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You identify the main increase in visitor numbers, from 74,000 to 92,000, and note the rise in very satisfied responses and the unchanged no-response figure. However, the overview is too general: “people were very satisfied” does not clearly summarise the overall shift from mostly dissatisfied responses before refurbishment to mostly satisfied responses afterwards. Some key figures are omitted, including the rise in satisfied visitors from 30% to 40% and the fall in very dissatisfied responses from 10% to 5%; the statement that dissatisfaction “fell by half” is also inaccurate, since the dissatisfied category fell from 40% to 15%. The response is 143 words, below the 150-word minimum. Include a fuller overview and report the main categories accurately.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a basic paragraph structure, moving from an introduction and overview to details, and phrases such as “Overall” and “Looking at the details” help signal this organisation. However, progression within the detail paragraphs is uneven: the account moves from visitor totals to satisfaction categories, then returns to dissatisfaction and non-response without a clear comparison framework. “This is followed by satisfied” is an unclear link, and “Moving further” does not establish a meaningful next stage. Group the satisfaction results into positive and negative responses, comparing before and after consistently, and use referencing that makes each figure’s period clear. This would make the organisation more coherent and reduce the impression of loosely connected observations.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some task-relevant vocabulary, including “refurbishment,” “proportion,” “dissatisfied,” and “increased,” so the reader can generally understand the topic. However, the range is limited and several choices or forms are inaccurate or repetitive. “Table chart” is not an appropriate description of the visuals, while “the figure of visitors” and “total number accounted for” are awkward collocations. There are also spelling errors such as “informatipn,” “satified,” and “perventage,” which make the writing less controlled. Prefer precise chart language and avoid repeatedly substituting “restoration,” “renovation,” and “development” for refurbishment when the meaning is not improved. More accurate collocations and careful proofreading would strengthen clarity.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more extended sentences, including a comparison with “this figure increased by 18,000 after refurbishment.” However, control is inconsistent, and errors occur in basic sentence patterns as well as longer constructions. For example, “a Ashdown Museum” has an article error, “before renovation it were 15%” has incorrect subject–verb agreement, and “35% people were very satisfied” is missing a grammatical link such as “of.” The sentence beginning “This is followed by satisfied” is also incomplete or unclear in its construction. Use complete, direct sentences and check articles, agreement, and the grammatical structure around percentages. Greater accuracy in these recurring patterns would make the comparisons easier to follow.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.