Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-10-12

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The table compares the number of visitors to ashdown museum between two years, one was before the refurbishment and following the year after refurbishment. The chart illustrate the outcomes of survey asking vistors about their satisfaction level, in these two years.

overall, the table shows that number of visitors increased considerabley after the museum's refurbishment in following year from 74,000 to 92,000 respectevely. whereas charts show the level of satisfied vistors rose significantly after refurbishment. which shows changes in musem had have positive impact on visitors's satisfactory level and also declined dissatisfied visitors. in table, total number of 18,000 visitors increased significantly during the year after refurbishment from 72,000 to 92,000. The both charts compare the visitors's satifactery level and illustrate positive impact of refurbishment because the proportion of very satisfied vistors rose from 15% to 35% and satisfied vistors significantly increased from 30% to 40%. As a result, 75% visitors shows positive feedback about reburbishment. Additionaly, the proportion of dissatied visitor also reduced from 40% to 15% meanwhile the proportion of no respone vistors remain same in both years. overall, changes in museum had have positive impact on visitor's feedback.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You cover both the visitor totals and the satisfaction surveys, and your overview identifies the main pattern: attendance rose and feedback became more positive after refurbishment. The reported survey figures for very satisfied, satisfied, dissatisfied and no response are accurate. However, there is an important inconsistency in the visitor total: the overview correctly gives 74,000 before refurbishment, but the body later says 72,000. Also, “75% visitors shows positive feedback” is unclear and does not accurately summarise the after-refurbishment results: the two positive categories total 75%, but this should be stated as the share who were satisfied or very satisfied. The main features are relevant, though the comparison of very dissatisfied responses (10% to 5%) is omitted. Check figures carefully and explain the key comparisons precisely.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has a recognisable structure, moving from an introduction to an overview and then to supporting details. The contrast between rising satisfaction and falling dissatisfaction is also relevant. However, progression is weakened by repetition: the positive impact of refurbishment is stated several times, including in the overview and the final sentence, while the body repeats the visitor increase. Paragraphing is unclear because the overview and details run together, and the long gap before the final data paragraph does not create a clear structure. Some linking is awkward or inaccurate, such as “whereas charts show” and “meanwhile” in the final comparison. Use distinct paragraphs for the introduction, overview and details, and connect each comparison directly to the relevant figures.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use relevant task vocabulary, including “refurbishment,” “proportion,” “survey” and “dissatisfied,” and the reader can generally understand the intended comparisons. However, the range is limited and several spelling and word-form errors are noticeable, such as “vistors,” “considerabley,” “respectevely,” “satifactery” and “reburbishment.” Some expressions are also unnatural or imprecise: “satisfaction level” is repeated, “positive feedback” is used where a percentage of respondents is meant, and “the level of satisfied visitors rose” is not a natural collocation. Aim for accurate, varied terms such as “visitor satisfaction,” “share of respondents” and “the proportion who were satisfied.” Proofreading spelling and choosing precise collocations would make the data description clearer.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including comparisons linked with “whereas” and “because,” but control is inconsistent. Errors in sentence boundaries and punctuation are evident in “overall, the table shows…” and “which shows changes…,” where a capital letter or a complete sentence is needed. There are also problems with articles, agreement and verb forms: “The chart illustrate,” “number of visitors increased,” and “museum had have positive impact.” The phrase “one was before the refurbishment and following the year after refurbishment” is difficult to follow grammatically. These errors sometimes make relationships between ideas unclear, although the main message remains understandable. Practise accurate sentence construction and check subject–verb agreement, articles and verb forms before submitting.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.