Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-10-13

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The given table illustrates the numbers of torists to Ashdown Museum a year before and after it was refurbished.the pie charts compares the result of survey about tutorists statisfactory with their visit during the same period of time.

Overall, what stands out from the table is that the total number of visitors after refurbishment were much higher than before.Moreover,form satisfaction point of view it is clealy seen thatmostly visitors were dissatisfied before refurbishment.In contrast ,a large number of individuals were satisfied after refurbishment.

Initially,the of individuals a year before refurbishment were 74000 but these numbers were rose to 92000 after rebusbishment.This shows a huuge rise in visitors.

A Pie charts demonstrates tourists satisfactions a year before and after refurbishment.A year before refurbishment mostly people were dissatisfied that was 40 but after refurbishment these numbers were decresed to 15 which was highest decrease .There are 30 individuals were satisfied before but this saw a considerable rise and reached 40 after refurbishment.Although ,no response remains stable during th both periods.There was huge rise in very satisfied results which were 15 before but after refurbishment there was huge surge in these and reached to 35.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You cover the main features and make relevant comparisons: visitor numbers rose from 74,000 to 92,000, dissatisfaction fell from 40% to 15%, and satisfaction increased after refurbishment. Your overview also identifies the broad contrast between the two survey periods. This meets the task well, with some evidence of the more selective, comparative reporting expected at a stronger level. However, the account is not fully complete: it omits the change in “very dissatisfied” responses (10% to 5%) and does not mention that “no response” remained at 5%. Also, “mostly people were dissatisfied” is imprecise because 40% was the largest category, not a majority. Include these details and distinguish clearly between percentages and visitor counts.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, an overview, and separate paragraphs for visitor numbers and survey results. This gives the reader a coherent overall route through the information. You also use linking expressions such as “Overall,” “In contrast,” and “Moreover” to signal relationships. At times, however, cohesion is mechanical or unclear. The transition from the overview to “Initially” is not especially precise, and “these numbers” in the visitor paragraph could refer to either the people or the total. The final paragraph also packs several survey comparisons together, making the progression harder to follow. Organise the survey results into clear positive and negative changes, and use explicit references such as “the proportion of dissatisfied visitors”.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some task-relevant vocabulary, including “refurbishment,” “considerable rise,” “decreased,” and “remains stable,” and the main information is generally understandable. However, the range and control are limited by repeated or inaccurate wording. “Tourists” and “individuals” are not the most natural terms for museum survey respondents; “visitors” is more precise. Phrases such as “satisfactions,” “satisfied results,” and “huge surge in these” are awkward or unclear, while spelling errors including “torists,” “clealy,” and “decresed” are noticeable. Aim for accurate collocations and avoid intensifiers such as “huge” when a neutral description is more suitable. A more precise vocabulary would make the comparisons easier to interpret.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including contrast structures such as “Although…” and “In contrast…”. Nevertheless, errors in sentence construction, agreement, articles, and punctuation are frequent enough to make some passages difficult to read. For example, “the total number of visitors … were much higher” has a subject–verb agreement problem, and “There are 30 individuals were satisfied” combines incompatible sentence patterns. The opening also runs two sentences together after “refurbished,” and “the of individuals” is an incomplete construction. Practise building complete clauses with one clear subject and verb, and check agreement and sentence boundaries. For example: “The number of visitors rose from 74,000 to 92,000 after the refurbishment.”

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.