Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-10-13

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The table depicts counts of visitors to Ashdown Museum in two different time period, before and after refurbishment. Whereas, the pie charts display feedback of surveys related to their experience during their visit.

Overall, the number of visitors to Ashdown Museum increased. The result of survery shows positive results compared to the previous results, with unchanged No Response.

Before the refurbishment, the number of visitors visited the museum was just under 75,000. However, the numbers were increase in visitors by 18,000, reached nearly 92,000.

The survey conducted before the refurbishment shows mixed review, with 15% of visitors were very satisfied, 30% of visitors were satisfied. These numbers are improved and increased as the Very Satisfy ratio are increased to 35% and Satisfied ratio to 40% respectively. The negative review, dissatisfied and very dissatisfied were 40% and 10% before refurbishment, but after refurbishment the ratio was decreased to 15% and 5% respectively. Notebly, the ratio of No Response remains unchanged to just 5%.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

The response selects the main features accurately: visitor numbers rose from 74,000 to 92,000, satisfaction increased, dissatisfaction fell, and the no-response share stayed at 5%. It also supports these points with the relevant survey figures, including the rise in “very satisfied” responses from 15% to 35% and the fall in “dissatisfied” responses from 40% to 15%. This gives the report a clear overview and covers both the table and charts. To make the account more fully developed, state the overall contrast between positive and negative responses more explicitly, and use precise comparisons rather than general phrases such as “positive results.” The main information is well selected, though some interpretation remains broad.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a coherent overall arrangement: it introduces the visuals, gives an overview, then describes visitor numbers and survey results. This sequence makes the information easy to follow, and contrast markers such as “However” and “but” help signal changes. Some linking is mechanical or unclear, however. “Whereas” at the start of the second sentence does not connect two balanced clauses, and “These numbers” could refer to either satisfaction category. The survey details are also packed into one long paragraph, making comparisons less easy to scan. Use clearer references and group the positive and negative responses into separate, logically linked comparisons to strengthen progression.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The vocabulary is sufficient to communicate the main trends, with useful task-related terms such as “increased,” “decreased,” “ratio,” and “unchanged.” However, several word choices and collocations are inaccurate or repetitive, which limits precision. “Counts of visitors” and “numbers of visitors visited” are awkward, while “mixed review” is less suitable for describing survey proportions. There are also spelling and word-form slips, including “survery,” “Notebly,” and “Very Satisfy.” Aim for natural reporting language and consistent labels, such as “visitor numbers,” “responses,” and “very satisfied.” More precise vocabulary would make the comparisons sound clearer and more academic.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

The response attempts a mix of simple and more complex structures, including “Whereas…” and clauses introduced by “with” and “but.” The meaning is generally recoverable, but some grammatical errors recur. For example, “in two different time period” has a number-agreement error, and “the number of visitors visited the museum was” uses an incorrect clause structure. “The numbers were increase” has an incorrect verb form, while “15% of visitors were very satisfied” is awkwardly joined to the preceding clause. Work on plural agreement, verb forms, and sentence boundaries, and revise complex sentences so each clause has a clear grammatical structure. These corrections would improve accuracy without sacrificing variety.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.