Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-10-13
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
This survey shows us that how people responds to the ashdown museum before and after refurbishment.Given data showed that the number of visitors increased after refurbishment proving it a successful aproach .If we look at the chart of visitors feedback a significant difference can be noted although the number of very satisfied visitors remained same in both conditions .However rate of satisfied visitors also increases from 3o to 40.and also in year after refurbishment the dissatisfied visitors are significantly decreased from 40 to 15 that is a great gap.Also the number of very dissatisfied visitors also got lessen as in year before refurbishment it was 10 and after it decreased to 5 and also a lot of visitors took interest in giving feedback a previously the no response ratio was high but after refurbishment it was significantly increased.we can say that refurbishment was prove to be an effective step for museum.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 4.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
You identify the broad pattern that visitor numbers rose after refurbishment and that dissatisfaction fell, which are relevant main features. However, some key data are misreported: the number of very satisfied visitors did not remain the same; it rose from 15% to 35%. You also say the no-response ratio increased, whereas it stayed at 5% in both periods. The total visitor figures, 74,000 and 92,000, are not included, and the response gives no clear, balanced overview of the survey’s overall shift from mostly dissatisfied to mostly satisfied. To strengthen the report, state the main comparisons accurately, include the visitor totals, and distinguish percentages from visitor counts.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5
The response follows a broadly relevant order, moving from visitor numbers to satisfaction categories, and words such as “However” and “also” show attempts to connect points. Nevertheless, it is presented as one long paragraph, so the overview and supporting comparisons are not clearly separated. Several ideas are joined in a repetitive chain with “and also,” while transitions such as “However” do not always signal a clear contrast. The reference to “both conditions” is also vague. Organise the report into a short introduction, an overview, and a paragraph of key details; group the satisfaction changes logically and use precise links between comparisons.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
You use some task-related vocabulary, including “refurbishment,” “visitors,” “satisfied,” and “dissatisfied,” and phrases such as “significant difference” show an attempt to describe change. However, the range is limited and several choices or forms are inaccurate or awkward, which sometimes makes the meaning unclear. For example, “visitors feedback” is not a natural way to describe survey results, and “took interest in giving feedback” does not accurately express the unchanged no-response figure. Spelling errors such as “aproach” and “ashdown” also reduce control. Aim for precise chart language, such as “the proportion of visitors,” “rose,” and “fell,” and check spelling and collocations.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
The response attempts longer sentences and uses some subordinate structures, for example, “although the number of very satisfied visitors remained same.” However, sentence control is inconsistent, and errors frequently affect readability. Examples include “how people responds,” “the number … remained same,” and “refurbishment was prove,” which show problems with agreement, articles, and verb forms. Missing spaces after full stops and inconsistent punctuation also make sentence boundaries difficult to follow. Use shorter, complete sentences to report each comparison, then add more complex structures only when you can control them. Check subject–verb agreement and ensure each sentence has a correctly formed verb.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
