Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-10-13

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

the available diagrams illustrates the ashdown museum visted by peoples before and after reconstruction.the present chart indicates the satisfaction ratio of individuals in between two identical periods .

according to available data 74000 citizens vist mesume but number gose rise upto 92000 after development of buliding .percentage records at first 40 % was dissatisfied,30% very dissatisfied in addition 15% persons were very satisfied morover only 10% satisfied and only 5 % were those human beings who shows no response about museum design before transformation.however highiest portion 40% in table accumulated by dissatisfied vistors rather then least number 5% people show no concern about venue structure and design before construction .

a big change observed in response of people who visited mesume after modifications .largest number contributed by satisfied peoples is about 40% followed by very satisfied 35% and 15 % reported by those who were dissatisfied.only 5 % equally contributed by very dissatisfied and by those who were reported no response .therefore highiest percentage 40% not satisfied before refurbishment and turn into satisfied after building modifications.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You identify the main overall changes: visitor numbers rose from 74,000 to 92,000, and satisfaction was generally higher after refurbishment. You also report several survey figures, so the response is relevant to both the table and charts. However, some figures for the year before are misassigned: 40% were dissatisfied, not very dissatisfied; 30% were satisfied, not very dissatisfied; and 10% were very dissatisfied, not satisfied. These errors weaken the accuracy of the comparisons. The overview is also not fully clear: the final claim that the highest percentage “turn into satisfied” oversimplifies the shift, since the largest category after refurbishment was satisfied at 40%, while very satisfied rose substantially to 35%. Check each category against the chart and state the key shifts precisely.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a basic progression from introducing the visuals, to describing the earlier period, and then to the later period. Linking expressions such as “however,” “in addition,” and “therefore” show an attempt to connect ideas. However, the organisation is weakened by long, crowded sentences and unclear relationships between points. For example, the first-period figures are run together, and “however highiest portion 40% in table accumulated…” repeats information without making the comparison clearer. The opening also does not clearly separate the table’s visitor totals from the survey results. Use distinct paragraphs for the overview and the two periods, and group positive responses together against negative responses. This would create a clearer progression and make comparisons easier to follow.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

You attempt a range of vocabulary related to the topic, including “satisfaction,” “dissatisfied,” “modifications,” and “transformation.” However, word choice and collocation are often inaccurate or unnatural, which sometimes makes the meaning difficult to follow. Phrases such as “satisfaction ratio,” “citizens vist mesume,” “largest number contributed by satisfied peoples,” and “those human beings who shows no response” are not suitable ways to describe survey proportions. Spelling errors, including “mesume,” “gose,” and “highiest,” also reduce clarity. Aim for precise, conventional chart language such as “the proportion of visitors,” “accounted for,” and “respondents gave no answer.” A smaller set of accurate terms would be more effective than repeated or awkward alternatives.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

There are attempts to combine ideas using clauses and linking words, but sentence structures are often faulty, and errors frequently make the account harder to understand. For example, “the available diagrams illustrates” has subject–verb disagreement, while “40% was dissatisfied” does not use an appropriate plural construction for the visitors represented. The opening sentence also lacks clear sentence boundaries, and several later sentences join multiple claims without reliable punctuation. Articles and sentence patterns are often missing or incomplete, as in “before construction” and “largest number contributed by satisfied peoples is about 40%.” Practise writing short, complete sentences first, then add controlled comparisons using forms such as “the proportion who were satisfied rose from…to…”.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.