Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-10-16

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The table compares the amount of tourists visiting Ashdown Museum prior to and following its renovation. The pie chart illustrates and compares the satisfaction level of the sightseers from the same time range.

Overall, it is evident that museum recieved far more attendants following its renovation. Less of the excursionists disregarded their trip as compared to the bigger number of individuals doing so before any alterations were done.

An increase of almost 18000 visitors was seen after the building got some interior changes. A year before all the changes were made, the major chunk,almost 40% of the total people, disapproved of the building structure while only 10% people enjoyed their visit to a satisfactory level, nevertheless people who clearly dispproved their visit after modifications were only 15% of the total. While only 15% people truly felt completely contented of their visit in the year before modification, the same group jumped to 35% after the renovation. However, people who did not fill the satisfaction forms were found to be equal.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You cover both the visitor total and the satisfaction surveys, and your overview identifies the two main changes: attendance rose after refurbishment, while dissatisfaction declined and strong satisfaction increased. The figures you give for the survey categories are generally accurate, including the unchanged 5% with no response. This meets the task well, with some features reported clearly. However, the comparison is not fully developed: the rise from 74,000 to 92,000 is described as “almost 18000,” but the exact increase is 18,000, and the response does not report the 40% who were satisfied after refurbishment or compare the combined satisfied and dissatisfied groups. Also clarify that 40% were dissatisfied before refurbishment, rather than saying they disapproved of the building structure. More precise selection and explanation would strengthen the report further.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, an overall summary, and a paragraph with supporting figures. This gives the reader a coherent route through the information, and linking expressions such as “Overall,” “However,” and “While” help signal comparisons. Some connections are less clear or slightly mechanical, though. For example, “Less of the excursionists disregarded their trip” is difficult to connect precisely to the survey categories, and the final paragraph moves between dissatisfaction, satisfaction, and non-response without a consistent order. Organising the details by survey category—satisfied, dissatisfied, then no response—and comparing both years within each category would make progression clearer. Keep the overview distinct from detailed figures and use references such as “this proportion” only when their meaning is unmistakable.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You attempt a varied vocabulary, using terms such as “renovation,” “modifications,” “contented,” and “sightseers.” However, several choices are unnatural or imprecise for describing a museum survey. “Amount of tourists” is less suitable than “number of visitors,” while “attendants” usually means people who provide assistance, not visitors. “Disregarded their trip” does not clearly express dissatisfaction, and “disapproved of the building structure” changes the survey’s meaning: it measured satisfaction with the visit, not approval of the building. There are also spelling errors, including “recieved” and “dispproved.” Aim for accurate, conventional report vocabulary rather than replacing simple terms with less fitting synonyms; this will make your comparisons more precise and natural.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of sentence forms, including complex comparisons such as “While only 15% … the same group jumped to 35%,” and most of the message remains understandable. Some grammatical errors and punctuation problems persist. In “museum recieved far more attendants,” the article is missing before “museum”; “only 10% people” needs “of” or “of the people”; and “contented of their visit” uses an incorrect grammatical pattern. The sentence beginning “A year before all the changes were made” also has a long, crowded sequence of clauses, with punctuation missing after “chunk.” Use shorter, controlled comparisons and check articles, prepositions, and punctuation. These adjustments would improve accuracy while preserving the range of structures you are already attempting.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.