Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-10-16

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

the table and pie chart presents information on the changes in number of visitors and their satisfaction level at ashdown museum during the tewelve- month periods before and after its remodeling.

overall, it is evidence that museum has witnessed a substancial growth in total indivisual numbers after the renovation . meanwhile, the public satisfaction level faced negative feedback .

regarding customer, the total number of people visiting the museum stood at 74,000 before refurbishment. in addition to , their was a sharp increase in number which rose upto nearly 92,000 indivisulas after the renovation.

in terms of visitors satisfaction, the proportion of people who reported being very satisfied doubled from 15% to 35% after the refurbishment. similarly, the satisfied group grew from 30% to become the largest group at 40%. conversely, the level of dissatisfaction dropped sharply from 40% to 15% . while the very dissatisfied categry halved from 10% to 5%.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You identify the main overall changes: visitor numbers rose from 74,000 to 92,000, while satisfaction improved, with the satisfied and very satisfied shares increasing and dissatisfaction falling. The key figures you report are accurate, and you make relevant comparisons across both periods. This is a strong response to the task. However, the overview says satisfaction “faced negative feedback,” which conflicts with the figures and your later account of improvement; it should state the overall positive shift clearly. You also omit the unchanged 5% who gave no response, and the visitor-number comparison is less developed than the survey discussion. A more precise overview and a brief mention of this stable category would make the coverage more complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The response is organised into a clear introduction, overview and two detail paragraphs, moving logically from visitor totals to satisfaction results. Linking expressions such as “similarly” and “conversely” help signal comparisons, and the reader can follow the main trends. Some connections are less effective: “meanwhile” introduces an overview statement that contradicts the positive satisfaction figures, while “in addition to” is awkwardly used to connect the visitor totals. The final satisfaction details are also compressed into a sentence beginning “while,” which leaves the relationship slightly incomplete. Use transitions that accurately express contrast or similarity, and make each sentence grammatically complete to strengthen the otherwise clear progression.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use a reasonable range of task-related vocabulary, including “refurbishment,” “proportion,” “doubled,” “largest group” and “dropped sharply.” These choices allow you to describe the main comparisons, and most meaning remains clear. However, some word choices and collocations are inaccurate or imprecise: “public satisfaction level faced negative feedback” does not naturally describe the survey results, and “individual numbers” is unclear for visitor totals. Spelling errors such as “tewelve,” “substancial,” “indivisulas” and “categry” also reduce accuracy. Aim for standard chart-reporting phrases such as “visitor numbers,” “satisfaction levels increased,” and “the very dissatisfied share fell,” and check spelling carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and more complex structures, including comparisons with “from … to …” and a contrast introduced by “conversely.” The main figures and trends are generally understandable. Some grammatical errors remain, however. The opening needs subject–verb agreement (“The table and pie chart present”), and “it is evidence that museum has witnessed” has problems with article use and sentence construction. In “in addition to, their was a sharp increase,” the linking phrase and “there” are incorrectly formed; “which rose” also has an unclear reference. The final “while” clause is not a complete sentence. Review agreement, articles, pronouns and clause boundaries, and punctuate sentence openings consistently.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.