Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-10-18

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The table illustrates a comparison of the numbers of tourist visting and the pie charts shows the feedback surveys of visting the Ashdown Museum, before and year after it was refurbished. Overall, the number of toursist increased after the museum was refurbished and the porportion of results among very disstaisfed was the highest in before, whereas in after year more visitors were satisfied.

The data in the table shows number of visitors to Ashdown Museum. The numbers of tourist visited before renovation were 74,000, whereas these digits increased to 92,000 after completion of the work.

The charts shows the porportion of satisfaction before and after the renovation, in which the people visted before had the higher dissatifaction rate at 40% and compared to it in the year after the result number reduced to 15%. In contrast, the satisfaction rate after increased to 40% then before with 30%. The peoples who did not response reamined stable before and after with no changes at 5%. Also, the very dissatisfaction had a decreased to 5% after rebuilt of the museum.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You cover both the visitor totals and the satisfaction surveys, and your overview identifies the main shifts: attendance rose from 74,000 to 92,000, while dissatisfaction fell and satisfaction increased. The figures you report for dissatisfaction, satisfaction, and no response are accurate. However, the overview is not fully precise: “the proportion … very dissatisfied was the highest” is unclear, and the largest category before refurbishment was dissatisfied (40%), not very dissatisfied (10%). You also omit the after-refurbishment figure for very satisfied (35%) and do not report the before figure for very dissatisfied (10%). This is a relevant, generally clear account, but some key comparisons are less fully selected and expressed than they could be.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction and overview are followed by a paragraph on visitor numbers and one on survey results. This gives the reader a logical route through the information, and contrasts such as “whereas” and “In contrast” help signal comparisons. Some connections are less clear or repetitive, however. The phrase “increased to 40% then before with 30%” makes the comparison difficult to follow, while “The data in the table shows number of visitors” repeats information already introduced. The overview’s reference to “the highest” category is also ambiguous. More precise linking and clearer references to each year would make the progression smoother and more flexible.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some task-relevant vocabulary, including “comparison,” “proportion,” “dissatisfaction rate,” and “remained stable,” so the reader can identify the main subject and trends. However, the range and control are limited by repeated spelling and word-form errors, including “visting,” “tourist,” “porportion,” “disstaisfed,” and “dissatifaction.” Several expressions are also unnatural or imprecise: “numbers of tourist visting,” “these digits,” and “the result number reduced” do not describe the data idiomatically. Use standard chart language such as “visitor numbers,” “percentage,” and “the proportion fell,” and check spelling carefully. These issues make the account less fluent and occasionally require the reader to interpret the intended meaning.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt a mix of simple statements and longer comparisons, for example, “The numbers … were 74,000, whereas these digits increased to 92,000.” This shows some ability to connect clauses, but control is inconsistent. Errors include subject–verb agreement in “the pie charts shows” and “The charts shows,” missing articles in “shows number of visitors,” and faulty constructions such as “had a decreased to 5%.” The sentence beginning “In contrast” also has an unclear comparison structure. These errors sometimes make relationships between figures harder to understand, although the overall message remains recoverable. Focus on accurate basic sentence patterns and practise a few controlled comparative structures, such as “rose from … to …” and “was lower than …”.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.