Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-10-18

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The given table demonstrates the count of visitors in the years before and after the renovation took place in Ashdown Museum. Two pie-charts illustrate the outcome of survey conducted on guests, which show different levels of satisfaction before and after refurbishment.

It is visible from the table that, more visitors showed up at Ashdown museum after the refurbishment than before. Based on two charts it is evident that, visitors are now highly satisfied whereas the dissatisfied guests were more in number before renovation works. At the same time, few visitors did not respond in both the surveys.

Before refurbishment 74000 guests visited the museum but the number rose to 92000 as 18000 more guests did visit after renovation, which indicates that new decorations made to museum attracted new visitors.

Outcomes of two surveys confirm us that there were 40% visitors who showed dissatisfaction but that percentage became the indicator for satisfied visitors after refurbishment. The number of highly satisfied visitors grew considerably rising from 15% to 35%. Percentage for not interested participants in survey remained same which is 5%. There are still 5% attendees who were very dissatisfied after renovation but it used to be 10% earlier.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You cover both the visitor totals and the survey results, and your overview identifies the main shifts: attendance rose, satisfaction improved, and dissatisfaction declined. The figures you report are accurate, including the increase from 74,000 to 92,000 and the rise in very satisfied responses from 15% to 35%. This meets the task well and shows some of the stronger feature selection expected at the next level. However, the comparison that “40% visitors” became “the indicator for satisfied visitors” is unclear: 40% were dissatisfied before, while 40% were satisfied after. Also, the claim that new decorations attracted visitors is not shown by the data. Report the changes without assigning causes, and distinguish the two satisfaction categories more precisely.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall sequence: an introduction, a summary of the main trends, and then supporting details about attendance and survey percentages. This makes the information generally easy to follow. Linking phrases such as “At the same time” and “Before refurbishment” help signal relationships and time periods. However, the paragraphing is limited, and some connections are mechanical or unclear. For example, “Outcomes of two surveys confirm us that” does not smoothly introduce the comparison, while the sentence about 40% shifts between dissatisfaction before and satisfaction after without making the contrast explicit. Organise the survey details by comparing related categories directly, and use clearer references to each period to strengthen progression.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of task-related vocabulary, including “refurbishment,” “dissatisfaction,” “percentage,” and “rose,” and the meaning is generally clear. There are also attempts at more formal reporting language, such as “illustrate the outcome” and “grew considerably.” Some choices, however, are imprecise or unnatural for describing charts. “Guests showed up” is informal, “not interested participants” does not accurately describe people who gave no response, and “the indicator for satisfied visitors” is an unclear way to express the change in categories. “Confirm us” is also an unsuitable collocation. Aim for precise terms such as “visitors,” “no response,” and “the proportion of satisfied respondents,” while avoiding unsupported interpretations.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and more complex sentence forms, including clauses introduced by “whereas” and “which,” and most sentences remain understandable. Some grammatical errors persist, but they rarely prevent the reader from following the comparisons. For example, “the outcome of survey” needs an article, and “more visitors showed up … than before” has an incomplete comparison because it compares visitors with a time period. In “there were 40% visitors,” the percentage construction is not grammatical; use “40% of visitors.” There are also awkward comma placements after introductory phrases, as in “It is visible from the table that, …”. Review articles, percentage structures, and punctuation, and make sure comparisons match like with like.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.