Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-10-24

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The given table illustrates the number of tourist to a museum the year before and after it was renovated and two pie charts compares the result of survey to asking visitors how they satisfied during two times.

Overall, the number of travelers were increased after it was rebuilt, while in pie chart, the satisfied and very satisfied people experienced on upward trends and dissatisfied and very dissatisfied saw downward trends. No response was same as before and after remodel.

The mesuem before repair, the segment of the dissatisfied had the largest, accounted for 40% of the total. Followed by, the satisfied was the second highest portion at 30% roughly. Very satisfied and very dissatisfied were mad up 15% and 10% respectively. There are some people which had no response at 5% of the total.

The museum after refurbishment, the proportions of the very satisfied and satisfied were surged sharply from 15% to 35% and 30% to 40% in the same order. The fraction of the dissatisfied individuals fell significantly from 40% to 15% virtually. Also the segment of the very dissatisfied visitors declined gradually from 10% to 5% almost. Finally the portion of the no response people remained same before and after it was mend.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

You cover both the visitor total and the satisfaction surveys, and the main comparisons are accurate: attendance rose from 74,000 to 92,000, positive ratings increased, and dissatisfaction declined, while non-response stayed at 5%. The overview identifies these broad trends, and the body includes the key percentages for both periods. This gives the report a clear, relevant account of the data. To make the selection more fully developed, state the visitor totals explicitly in the body rather than referring only generally to an increase, and sharpen the overview by noting that dissatisfaction was the largest category before refurbishment, whereas satisfaction became the largest afterwards. These additions would make the most significant contrasts more prominent.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, an overview, and separate paragraphs for the two survey periods. This helps the reader follow the before-and-after comparison, and linking expressions such as “Overall,” “Also,” and “Finally” signal relationships between points. However, some transitions are awkward or mechanical, as in “Followed by” and “in the same order,” and the final paragraph repeats the same comparison pattern several times. The opening sentence also combines the table and charts in a way that is difficult to follow. For stronger progression, group the positive and negative rating changes more deliberately and use clear references to the two periods, so connections feel natural rather than formulaic.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You attempt a range of task-related vocabulary, including “proportions,” “segment,” “fraction,” “declined,” and “remained,” which allows you to describe changes and categories. However, word choice and collocation are often inaccurate or unnatural, and some errors make the report less fluent. Examples include “number of tourist,” “travelers were increased,” “satisfied people experienced on upward trends,” and “the museum … was mend.” There are also spelling errors such as “mesuem.” Use standard chart-reporting phrases consistently: visitor numbers “rose,” proportions “increased” or “fell,” and respondents “were satisfied.” More precise, natural vocabulary would improve clarity and control without requiring unnecessarily elaborate wording.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You use some complex sentence forms, including a contrast with “while” in the overview and clauses beginning “which” and “from … to …”. The reader can generally understand the comparisons, but grammatical control is uneven, with errors in agreement, verb forms, articles, and sentence construction. For example, “two pie charts compares” has subject–verb disagreement, while “the number of travelers were increased” uses an incorrect passive form and agreement. “The satisfied was the second highest portion” also has an unclear grammatical construction. Aim for reliable patterns such as “The number of visitors increased” and “The proportion of satisfied visitors rose from 30% to 40%.” Check singular/plural agreement and build complete, well-formed sentences before adding complex clauses.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.