Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-10-25

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The table represents the data on attendence of Ashdown Museum in two periods: year before and year after refurbishment. The pie charts show the proportions of different levels of visitors' satisfaction with the museum.

Overall, the total number of visitors to the museum rised significantly after refurbishment comparing with attendance before the start of proccess. The satisfaction level also showed the highly positive trend year after refurbishment.

The attendence of the Ashdown Museum showed very possitive improvement, starting at 74000 visitors before refurbishment, and procceding with 92000 after.

The data taking from the survey of visitors gives the strong statement that the proccess of refurbishment gave a strongly positive boost to attendence. The year before people ranked their dissatisfation at 40% and 30% of visitors were satisfied, whereas year after 40% of visitors were satisfied with only 15% showing dissatisfaction. However, the rate of high satisfaction the year after accounted for impressing 35% of shares, whereas year before the number was 15%. Talking about strong dissatisfation, before it was holding 10% of users, which changed to 5% year after.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

You cover the main features and make relevant comparisons: visitor numbers rose from 74,000 to 92,000, while satisfaction improved, with the satisfied share increasing from 30% to 40% and dissatisfaction falling from 40% to 15%. The overview identifies both the rise in attendance and the more positive survey results. Most figures you report are accurate. However, the claim that refurbishment “gave” attendance a boost presents a causal conclusion that the charts do not establish; describe the changes as occurring after refurbishment instead. You could also make the overview more precise by noting that the combined satisfied categories rose from 45% to 75%, while the no-response share remained at 5%. This would make the key comparison more fully supported.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, an overview, and paragraphs giving attendance and survey details. The progression from the general trends to specific figures is easy to follow, and contrast markers such as “whereas” and “however” help connect comparisons. This gives the report a coherent foundation. To make the organisation more controlled, avoid repeating the same point about refurbishment producing a positive effect in both the overview and the survey paragraph. Some links are also slightly awkward, particularly “Talking about strong dissatisfaction,” which sounds conversational rather than like a precise transition. Grouping the satisfaction categories consistently—positive responses first, then negative responses—would make the comparisons flow more smoothly.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant task vocabulary, including “proportions,” “satisfaction,” “dissatisfaction,” and “accounted for,” and the reader can understand the main trends. However, noticeable spelling and word-choice problems limit precision: “attendence,” “proccess,” “rised,” and “impressing” are inaccurate, while “strongly positive boost” and “strong dissatisfaction” are unnatural collocations. “Users” is also less suitable than “visitors” in this context. Aim for accurate, conventional report language rather than trying to intensify descriptions. For example, use “attendance increased,” “the refurbishment,” and “an impressive 35%” or simply “35%.” Careful proofreading of spelling and word forms would make your otherwise relevant vocabulary more effective.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mixture of simple and complex sentences, including comparisons with “whereas” and a relative clause in “the year before the number was 15%.” These structures help convey relationships between the figures, and the overall meaning remains understandable. However, errors in verb forms and sentence construction recur: “the total number … rised” should be “rose,” and “the satisfaction level … showed the highly positive trend” needs a more accurate article and structure. The phrase “The data taking from the survey … gives” also has an incomplete participle construction and awkward agreement. Practise forming accurate past-tense reporting sentences and checking articles and clause structure. More reliable control of these patterns would allow your comparisons to read clearly without sacrificing sentence variety.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.