Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-10-30

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The table chart illustrate many people visitors ashdown. Museum before and after it was renovated. The two pic chart show the ruselt of visitors satisfaction sueveys during the same time.

The total number of visitors increased aftre the renovation. In addition, people were much happier with their visit after the changes were mood.

After the ronovation, the total number of visitors rose from 74,000 to 92,000. At the same time satisfaction level is improved a lot. Before the changes, only 15% of visitors were "Very satisfied" But this number is went up to 35% similirly, the percentage of "Satisfied" visitors increased from 30% to 40% .

On the other hand, the number of unhappy visitors dropped sharply. The precentage of "Dissatisfied" visitors decreased 40% to 15% likrwise. "very dissatisfied"visitors fell from 10% to 5%.Lastly the proportion of people who gave no response stayed the same at 5%.

The refurbishment was very successful. It not only attracted significantly more visitors to ashdown museum but also grealty improved overall customer.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.5

You cover the main features accurately and provide a clear overview: visitor numbers rose after refurbishment, satisfaction improved, and the no-response share remained unchanged. The figures are well selected, including the increase from 74,000 to 92,000 and the shifts in each satisfaction category. Your comparison of dissatisfied and very dissatisfied visitors also captures the overall decline. This is a strong, well-supported response to the task. To make the reporting more precise, avoid the broad concluding claim that the museum “greatly improved overall customer” without completing or specifying the idea; the chart measures reported satisfaction, not customer experience in general. A more concise conclusion focused on the survey results would keep the final point fully grounded in the data.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall progression: an introduction, an overview, then details about visitor numbers and satisfaction, followed by a concluding statement. Linking phrases such as “In addition,” “On the other hand,” and “Lastly” help signal relationships between points. This gives the reader a coherent account, and the comparisons are generally grouped sensibly. However, some connections feel mechanical, particularly the repeated use of “increased” and the sequence “similirly” and “likewise.” The final sentence also feels abrupt and incomplete, which weakens the ending. For stronger cohesion, use a wider range of natural comparison structures and ensure each paragraph develops one clear focus without relying on a list-like sequence of transitions.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use relevant task vocabulary, including “refurbishment,” “satisfaction,” “percentage,” and “dropped sharply,” so the reader can follow the main comparisons. However, the range and control are limited by frequent spelling errors and awkward or inaccurate word choices, such as “pic chart,” “ruselt,” “mood,” and “customer.” Some phrases are also unnatural, including “many people visitors” and “satisfaction level is improved a lot.” These errors sometimes make the wording difficult to interpret, even though the intended meaning is usually recoverable. Aim for accurate, conventional chart language and check spelling carefully. Reusing precise terms such as “proportion,” “share,” and “visitor satisfaction” will help you describe the data more clearly and avoid awkward repetition.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt some longer sentences and use a range of basic structures, including contrast and addition, as in “On the other hand, the number of unhappy visitors dropped sharply.” However, grammatical control is inconsistent, and errors occur frequently enough to affect clarity. For example, “The table chart illustrate” has subject–verb agreement and article problems, while “this number is went up” combines incompatible verb forms. In “the percentage … decreased 40% to 15%,” the comparison pattern is incomplete; use “decreased from 40% to 15%.” Punctuation is also unreliable, with missing spaces and inconsistent capitalisation around quoted categories. Practise accurate past-tense reporting and complete comparison structures, then proofread sentence boundaries and punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.