Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-11-07

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays, many medical research projects are funded by private companies. In your opinion, do you think that research should be carried by private companies, individuals or government?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

In modern scoiety, many medicial research projects are in terms to be get financially supported by private companies. While , others believe that it should be taken out by private companies, individuals or goverment. In my opinion, the medical research should be provided by goverment as it gives a credit to nation moreover many people can get to know about it.

To begin , Medial should be funded by goverment. Reserach support by goverment can help country to grow in both economic and finacially in terms of world. Likewise, it creates many employement to doctors future . Similarly, it gives support to many poeple and many individuals can get to know about it. because there are many people who don't know about goverment rewards and rank in comparision with other country. To illustrate , during the time of corona virus many medical research done by goverment became financially supported and provided by employements after it.

On the other hand, some individuals believe that it should be funded by private companies. However, it helps many companies to create employement and get achievement fo it became a strong country in terms of competition. For example, many companies who funded became a giant company who created a big name and provided many jobs in future.

To conclude, I firmly think that both opinion are strong in both point of view as they create many employement and became strongely independent on their terms creating a strong power on their side in terms of economic and financially.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You give a clear preference for government funding in the introduction and provide a separate paragraph acknowledging private companies, so the response is relevant to the question. However, the discussion only partially develops the choice among government, companies and individuals: individuals are mentioned in the opening but not considered in the body, and the conclusion shifts to saying both views are strong rather than reaffirming your preference. Reasons such as helping the economy, creating employment and raising national standing are repeated but not explained in enough detail. The coronavirus example is relevant in principle, but its connection to the claimed benefits is unclear. To strengthen the response, compare the funding options directly and explain one or two specific benefits and limitations with a clear example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, two body paragraphs and a conclusion. Paragraphs also broadly separate the government and private-company arguments. However, progression within paragraphs is limited: several points about employment, national strength and public awareness are placed together without showing how one leads to another. Linking expressions such as “Likewise,” “Similarly,” and “On the other hand” are used, but some connections feel mechanical or do not clarify the relationship between ideas. The conclusion also does not follow the position stated in the introduction. Improve cohesion by organising each paragraph around one main claim, then explaining and illustrating it, and use clear references and transitions to connect the argument.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

You use some topic-related vocabulary, including “medical research,” “funded,” “private companies,” “employment” and “competition,” which helps communicate the general subject. However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate or repetitive, sometimes making meaning difficult to follow. Examples include “in terms to be get financially supported,” “creates many employement to doctors future,” and “became a strong country in terms of competition.” There are also frequent spelling errors, such as “scoiety,” “medicial,” “Reserach” and “goverment.” Build a more precise set of phrases for discussing research funding and its outcomes, and check spelling and word forms carefully. Prefer natural combinations such as “fund research,” “create jobs” and “improve public health.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt some longer sentence forms, including a contrast introduced by “While” and a reason clause with “as,” but control is inconsistent. Many sentences contain errors in sentence construction, agreement, articles or verb forms, which can make the intended meaning difficult to understand. For example, “While, others believe that it should be taken out by…” is an incomplete or awkwardly connected clause, while “both opinion are strong” has an agreement error. In “many medical research done by goverment became financially supported,” the verb structure is also unclear. Most sentences rely on simple patterns, and attempts to combine ideas are often faulty. Practise writing complete sentences with one clear main clause, then add subordinate clauses only when their grammatical relationship is clear.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.