Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays, many medical research projects are funded by private companies. In your opinion, do you think that research should be carried by private companies, individuals or government?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The question on who should carry out the medical research projects has sparked heated debate. Some believe that private entities are responsible to carry the medical research ,others contend that individuals or the governments are primarily responsible to undertake these medical research. In my opinion I believe that private companies should be given sole role to work out medical research .

Individuals who contend that individuals or the parastatals can indulge in medical lab tests have in mind that individuals can work extra mile to come up with powerful medicinal product that can replace the existing drug in the market. People are motivated to come up with new drugs in order to become popular enhance they work tirelessly to manufacture superior drugs. Also governments can be responsible to research on the medical fields but government projects stall and take a longer time to resume hence unsuitable to perform scientific interventions on medicinal projects.

Private companies getting involved in medical tests and research is quick crucial in coming up with much more superior intervention of strong drugs. Medical projects carried out by sole companies are fully executed within stipulated time frame and the objectives of the project are fully attained . For instance, the corona virus vaccine was invented by private company within a short time after the spread of the Corona virus. Furthermore, private entities put focus on one invention at a time unlike the public companies that perform several research and results come after a disease have a large population.

In conclusion, while individuals and governments can undertake medical research, I believe the private companies are quite faster in interventions and work within short period to come up with drugs to control diseases hence saving human life. Overall, I would argue that nations should use private companies in scientific innovations of drugs.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear: you argue that private companies should lead medical research, and you address the alternatives of individuals and governments. The examples about government projects taking longer and the coronavirus vaccine help support your view. This meets the task well, and the response shows some development beyond simply stating an opinion. However, the discussion of individuals is less convincing: the claim that people seek popularity through developing drugs is not explained or supported, and the distinction between private and public research is sometimes broad. To strengthen the response further, explain why commercial funding or expertise produces better outcomes, and qualify claims with specific, accurate examples.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, a paragraph considering individuals and governments, a paragraph supporting private companies, and a conclusion that restates your view. This gives the reader an overall route through the argument. Some links, however, are mechanical or unclear. For example, “Also” introduces the government point without showing how it relates to the preceding claim, while “Furthermore” adds a relevant point but the comparison with “public companies” is confusing. The opening sentence of the second paragraph also repeats “individuals” and makes the paragraph’s focus difficult to follow. Use clearer topic sentences and make each paragraph develop one main comparison, with pronouns and references that identify the groups precisely.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You attempt a range of topic-related vocabulary, including “medical research,” “scientific interventions,” “stipulated time frame,” and “superior drugs.” These choices show an effort to discuss the subject beyond basic terms. However, several expressions are inaccurate or unnatural, such as “responsible to carry,” “work extra mile,” “quick crucial,” and “a disease have a large population.” Repetition of “medical research,” “private companies,” and “come up with” also limits flexibility. Some word choices make the intended meaning less precise, particularly “public companies” when you appear to mean government-funded research. Aim for natural collocations and precise terms, checking whether each phrase fits its context rather than choosing a more formal-sounding expression.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You use both simple statements and longer sentences with clauses, as in “For instance, the corona virus vaccine was invented by private company within a short time after the spread of the Corona virus.” This shows some range, and the main argument is generally understandable. However, errors occur in sentence construction, articles, agreement, and punctuation. Examples include “Individuals who contend that individuals or the parastatals can indulge…” (an awkwardly constructed clause), “by private company” (missing an article), and “after a disease have a large population” (subject–verb agreement). Commas are also missing or misplaced in the introduction, and spacing around punctuation is inconsistent. Practise building shorter, controlled sentences first, then add complex clauses while checking articles, verb agreement, and sentence boundaries.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.