Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-11-10
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Nowadays, many medical research projects are funded by private companies. In your opinion, do you think that research should be carried by private companies, individuals or government?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
A large number of research projects in medical sector are sponsored by non-government companies. In my opinion, the research work should be conducted by government body.
Without the financial aid a student cannot perform the research as this kind of work tends to be costly due to the field work, lab work, experimental expenses etc which can be unbearable for the student besides the expenses of study. For example, if the student performs the research project with the government grant, he will feel more bounded to finish the work without any burden and also he won't have to worry about the fact that he needs to manage the research funds besides his study expenses. Also if the student gets incentives due to his work from the
government he will be more drawn to the work on his own for his self development.
The output of the research work will be mostly beneficial to the country for the greater wellfare of the people of the country. As the students are working in the medical sector and these facilities will be used all over the country from which the government will get mostly benefitted. For instance, if a medical student can find the fast solution of different diseases like dengue, malaria etc by the university grant, the nation will be benefitted which results in better state of the country too.
In conclusion, instead of the non-government companies the government body should help the students to produce increased number of medical research projects with enough subsidies.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0
Your position is clear: you believe medical research should be funded by government rather than private companies. You give relevant reasons, including the high costs of research and the potential benefit to the country, and the examples of dengue and malaria help illustrate your point. However, the response addresses the choice of funder only partially. The prompt also mentions individuals, but you do not explain why individual funding is less suitable, and the discussion shifts to students without establishing that they are the main researchers. Several claims, such as government-funded work benefiting the whole country, need fuller explanation or more specific support. Develop each reason and compare the funding options directly to make your argument more complete.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction states your view, two body paragraphs present reasons, and a conclusion restates your position. The ideas within each paragraph are generally related, and examples follow the points they are intended to support. However, progression is sometimes difficult to follow because the first body paragraph moves between students’ expenses, government grants, incentives, and self-development without clearly showing how each point connects. Linking phrases such as “Also” and “For instance” help, but some connections are mechanical, and the reference in “these facilities” is unclear. Use clearer topic sentences and make the relationship between each claim and its example explicit.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You use vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “financial aid,” “research grant,” “medical sector,” and “diseases,” so the main ideas are understandable. There are also attempts at more formal expressions, such as “for the greater welfare of the people.” However, several word choices and collocations are inaccurate or unnatural, including “more bounded to finish,” “fast solution of different diseases,” and “get mostly benefitted.” Spelling errors such as “wellfare” also reduce accuracy. These issues do not prevent the reader from understanding your overall position, but they limit precision and naturalness. Build a bank of common academic collocations for research funding and public health, and check spelling and word forms during revision.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including conditional structures such as “if the student performs the research project with the government grant” and a subordinate clause beginning “As the students are working in the medical sector.” This gives the response some structural variety, and the main message remains understandable. However, errors occur in sentence construction and grammatical patterns. For example, “Without the financial aid a student cannot perform the research” needs an article after “aid,” while “the government body” and “the research work” are not consistently used with appropriate articles. The long sentence beginning “For example” also contains several clauses that are difficult to control. Practise accurate article use and break complex ideas into clearer sentences.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.