Band 4.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays, many medical research projects are funded by private companies. In your opinion, do you think that research should be carried by private companies, individuals or government?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 4.0)

Nowadays, scientific research is increasingly funded by private companies and individuals rather by relying solely on government support.

In my opinion, i do think that private organisations and individuals plays major role in scientific development. Goverment should take the higher responsibility for funding medical research projects.

For example, goverement can provide suffIent funds for project that can help develop vaccines, discover treament and prevent diseases.

Private companies encourages innovations, employment opportunities and tecnological development. This makes private companies and organisation has linited access to suffient funds and good health facilities

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 3.0

You state a relevant position: private organisations and individuals can contribute to scientific development, while government should take greater responsibility for medical research funding. The vaccine and disease-prevention example is also relevant. However, the response addresses the question only partially: it does not explain the roles of individuals, compare the three funding sources, or develop reasons for why government should lead. The final point about private companies and access to funds and health facilities is unclear and does not support your argument as written. The response is also substantially below the required 250 words, leaving the position and supporting ideas very limited. Develop each main reason with explanation and a specific example, and make your conclusion explicit.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5

There is a basic sequence from your general view to an example and then a point about private companies, so the reader can identify the broad topic and your preferred role for government. However, the response is too brief to establish a clear overall progression or develop distinct stages of an argument. The opening sentence is not clearly connected to the next claim, and the final sentence, beginning “This makes,” has an unclear relationship to the preceding idea. Use separate paragraphs for your position, supporting reasons, and conclusion, and connect each point explicitly with accurate transitions such as “For this reason” or “In contrast.” Clearer links between claims would make the argument easier to follow.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

You use some topic-relevant vocabulary, including “scientific research,” “funding,” “vaccines,” and “prevent diseases,” which helps communicate the subject. However, the range is limited, and several spelling and word-choice errors reduce precision: “Goverment,” “suffIent,” “treament,” “tecnological,” and “linited.” Some phrases are also awkward or unclear, particularly “private companies and organisation has linited access to suffient funds.” Aim for accurate spelling and more natural collocations, such as “allocate funding to medical research” and “develop treatments.” Expanding your vocabulary for explaining benefits, risks, and responsibilities would also help you compare government, companies, and individuals more precisely.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

The response uses mostly short, simple statements, with a few attempts to connect ideas, such as “For example” and “This makes.” These structures communicate some basic points, but there is little variety or evidence of controlled complex sentences. Agreement errors occur in “individuals plays” and “Private companies encourages”; the subject and verb do not match. The phrase “This makes private companies and organisation has” also has an incorrect sentence pattern, while “i” should be capitalised. Practise forming accurate sentences with singular and plural subjects, and use clauses to explain cause and effect—for example, “Because public funding is not driven by profit, governments can support research into diseases that affect poorer communities.”

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.