Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays, many medical research projects are funded by private companies. In your opinion, do you think that research should be carried by private companies, individuals or government?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

In present day and age, number of medical research projects are financed by private organisations. By keeping in mind, the corporate greed, I would prefer that any research which involves public health and safety should be done under the supervision of the government bodies.

Government bodies usually have public interests in their mind. They priortize the public health over profits and try to adapt the methods which give long term results. Unlike corporate sector, they don't develop facilities on behalf of the research they undertook, that can only generate loads of money for them. For instance, suppose a new kind of treatment is needed for kidney cancer which is considered to be resistent to chemotherapy. Major public cancer research centers have been assigned to do the task and find a solution. They will come up with the remedy or method which can be available to anyone with this kind of cancer regardless of their financial status. As far as private pharma companies concern, if they get their hands on this kind of breakthrough, they would certainly cash every cent out of it.

Governmental medical research facilities do have certain limitations that include lack of funds, newly developed technologically advanced equipments which are essential for this kind of research. Also, they might not be able to hire highly talented and qualified people who demands hefty amount of money as their salaries. Corporates buy them out and make them work for their customers. So, private organisations do have a upper hand in terms of resources and they are able to produce required results in significantly lower time than government agencies. For example, during COVID vaccines were developed by big pharmaceutical companies like Astrozenca that are majorly owned by private sector.

So, in conclusion we can say that if you want to achieve better results in no time, private companies are the way to go but you have to pay heavy price for that in shape of expensive healthcare services but if we can develop these facilities for our government research centres, we might not need to rely on the greedy corporate sector.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

Your position is clear: you favour government oversight and public-interest research, while acknowledging that private firms can deliver results faster because they have greater resources. You address the competing options and support your view with relevant examples, including cancer treatment and COVID vaccines. This gives the response a clear, relevant argument. To strengthen it further, develop the examples with more precise explanation: the cancer scenario is hypothetical, and the claim that public centres would make a treatment available regardless of patients’ finances is asserted rather than demonstrated. The conclusion also introduces a conditional solution—developing government facilities—that could be explained more fully. Avoid broad claims such as private firms “would certainly cash every cent out of it”; qualify them or support them with evidence.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction states your view, two body paragraphs compare public and private research, and a conclusion restates the trade-off. Linking expressions such as “Unlike,” “Also,” “For example,” and “So, in conclusion” help readers follow the argument. This is coherent, though some connections are mechanical or imprecise. The opening phrase “By keeping in mind” does not clearly connect the context to your opinion, and “So” is an informal, repetitive way to begin the conclusion. The second body paragraph moves from public-sector limitations to private-sector advantages and then to the vaccine example, but the relationship between these points could be signposted more explicitly. Use clearer transitions and references to show how each example supports your central position.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.5

You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “public health,” “long term results,” “chemotherapy,” “breakthrough,” and “technologically advanced equipment.” These choices make the subject and your comparison understandable, and phrases such as “upper hand in terms of resources” show an attempt at idiomatic expression. However, several word choices or collocations are inaccurate or informal: “corporate greed,” “cash every cent out of it,” and “buy them out” may sound overly sweeping or convey a different meaning than intended. There are also spelling errors, including “priortize,” “resistent,” and “Astrozenca.” Aim for precise, neutral academic phrasing and check spelling of technical names. More accurate collocations would make your argument sound more controlled and credible.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex structures, including contrast clauses (“Unlike corporate sector…”) and conditional forms (“if they get their hands on this kind of breakthrough…”). Meaning is generally clear, but some grammatical errors remain. For example, “number of medical research projects” needs an article, “as far as private pharma companies concern” has an incomplete verb pattern, and “people who demands” has subject–verb disagreement. In “facilities on behalf of the research they undertook,” the tense and clause relationship are unclear. There are also article and plural issues in phrases such as “a upper hand” and “technologically advanced equipments.” Review articles, agreement, and verb patterns, then proofread longer sentences to ensure their clauses connect accurately.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.