Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays, many medical research projects are funded by private companies. In your opinion, do you think that research should be carried by private companies, individuals or government?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

in todays fast changing world , many medical reserches are funded by the peivate companes. By which the countrys are growing with anormas speed. In result it incerese the GDP and national income . In my opinion govermnt should also need to invest in research and development of medical sector. This essay explin the advanteges and disadvantages before my own opinion.

On the one had, private companies are investing in medical research, which lead to the batter medical teratment of public. Which also increase the overall life of public . However that treatment is very expensive because the min motive of private companies is to earn the profite not the public wellfair. Where he soman middle class people could not afford that expensive treatement. For example the treate of heart and cancer need high amount of fund which a comman man is not able to pay.

ON the other hand, the goverment should invest for the public wellfair . i strongely believe that helps the poor an middle class group of people to get treatement in very cheape rate an they also can get th service of highly expensive equpments . For example the city scan and xray in very cheap rate. In contrast it also incrage the comatativeness of inventing the better medicans,eupmments etc.

To concude, i strongly belve that the medical research projects should be invested an cari out the the goverment , individuals o

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

You address the topic by comparing private funding with government investment and state a preference for government support, especially to make treatment affordable for poorer and middle-class patients. The examples of cancer and heart treatment, CT scans and X-rays are relevant. However, the position is not fully clear: the introduction says government should “also” invest, while the conclusion appears to favour government, individuals, or both, and ends unfinished. The discussion of private companies’ benefits and the government’s role is brief, with little explanation of how research itself would be funded or managed. The response is also 13 words below the required minimum. Develop each reason with clearer explanation and complete the conclusion so your answer fully addresses the question.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has a recognisable introduction, two body paragraphs contrasting private and government funding, and a concluding paragraph. “On the one hand” and “On the other hand” help signal the comparison, and the examples generally follow the relevant claims. However, progression is uneven: the opening moves from research funding to GDP without explaining the connection, and the conclusion is incomplete. Some links are inaccurate or unclear, such as “Which also increase the overall life of public” and “In contrast it also incrage the comatativeness,” making it difficult to see how the ideas relate. Use complete topic sentences, connect each example explicitly to its point, and ensure the conclusion summarises your position rather than introducing an unfinished list.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You attempt topic-related vocabulary, including “medical research,” “treatment,” “private companies,” “national income,” and “expensive equipment.” This gives the reader a basic sense of the subject, but the range is limited and several spelling and word-choice errors make parts difficult to understand. Examples include “reserches,” “peivate companes,” “wellfair,” and “comatativeness”; the intended meaning of the last item is especially unclear. Some expressions are also imprecise, such as “increase the overall life of public” and “high amount of fund.” Build a more accurate set of collocations for healthcare and research, and check spelling carefully. More precise vocabulary would help you explain affordability, public benefit, and the purpose of medical research.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You use some simple sentences and attempt longer structures with “because,” “which,” and “that,” but complex sentences are often incomplete or incorrectly formed. For example, “Which also increase the overall life of public” is a fragment, while “private companies are investing in medical research, which lead” has a subject–verb agreement error. Other problems include “the government should also need to invest” and the unfinished final sentence, “the medical research projects should be invested an cari out…”. Articles, plurals, verb forms, and punctuation are also inconsistent, which sometimes makes the intended meaning hard to follow. Practise writing complete sentences with one clear main clause, then check agreement and sentence boundaries before adding subordinate clauses.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.