Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays, many medical research projects are funded by private companies. In your opinion, do you think that research should be carried by private companies, individuals or government?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

At present, self maid companies help researcher by providing a financial support to research on medicine.

In my oppinion,although private funding is helpful, medical research should be mainly carriedout and controlled by the government, becausehealth is a basic human right, not a business.

Firstly, the main purpose of authorities is public welfare, not profit. When the government funds research , it focuses on disease that effect a significant of people , even if they are not profitable. In the UK, for instance,disease like hepatitis had greater impact on poor individuals. Private comopany may ignore these because of their low budget. While, the authorities has responsibility to protect all the citizen

Secondly, personal companies make expensive medicine that a broke people can not afford this

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.0

You give a clear opinion that government should lead medical research, and you offer relevant reasons: public welfare may take priority over profit, and private firms may produce medicines that people with low incomes cannot afford. However, the response addresses the task only partially. The second reason is left unfinished, and the example about hepatitis is difficult to follow and does not clearly show how government research would help. You also do not explain the possible roles of individuals or develop a specific example. The response is substantially below the required minimum length, so there is not enough explanation or support for your position. Develop each reason with a clear explanation and a relevant example, then conclude by restating your view.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a basic, recognisable structure: an introduction states your position, followed by two points introduced with “Firstly” and “Secondly.” This gives the reader some sense of direction. However, the progression is limited because the second point ends abruptly, and the first paragraph’s example is not clearly connected to the claim about government responsibility. Some linking is also awkward, such as “While, the authorities has responsibility,” which does not form a clear contrast or complete transition. To improve, use separate, fully developed paragraphs for each main reason, explain how each example supports its point, and add a conclusion. Use linking expressions only where the relationship between ideas is clear.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant topic vocabulary, including “medical research,” “financial support,” “public welfare,” “profit,” and “basic human right.” These choices make your main position understandable. However, the range is limited, and several inaccurate spellings or word choices distract the reader: “self maid,” “oppinion,” “comopany,” and “broke people.” Some phrases are also unnatural, such as “a significant of people” and “make expensive medicine.” Aim for accurate, natural collocations and a wider set of terms for funding, access, and public health. Proofreading spelling and choosing precise expressions would make your argument clearer and more convincing.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple statements and a longer sentence with a reason, as in “medical research should be mainly carried out and controlled by the government, because health is a basic human right.” This shows some ability to connect clauses. However, the range remains limited, and errors in sentence structure, agreement, articles, and punctuation are frequent enough to make parts difficult to read. For example, “the authorities has responsibility” has a subject–verb agreement problem, while “disease like hepatitis had greater impact” needs clearer plural and article use. The final sentence, “personal companies make expensive medicine that a broke people can not afford this,” is also structurally unclear. Practise building complete sentences and checking agreement, articles, and punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.