Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays, many medical research projects are funded by private companies. In your opinion, do you think that research should be carried by private companies, individuals or government?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Nowadays, many medical research projects are funded by private companies. From my perspective research should be carried by priavate companies but on same time monitored by government officials .

To begin with, Private firms produce opportunities for the researchers . In developing countries governments have to face multiple difficulties which restrict them from these type of initiatives , therefore space produced by them should be easily filled by many priavte companies . Moreover, private firms compete with the market and offer more salaries as compared to the governments .As there are multiple companies which are working in the markets a competition is built among them due to which requirements of the employees enhance .

In contrast sometimes these firms compromise on their audit system due to which rules and regulations are not implemented properly . Government should supervise all these projects and strictly audit their workings for the betterment of the process and the system.Moreover by doing so a balance is maintained between privitization and fedralization.

In a conclusion, although Privitization enhances the number of opportunities for the researchers and offers them a market competitive salary but there audit system by government officials should be strong and strict to ensure rules and regulation.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

Your position is identifiable: you support private companies conducting research, provided government officials monitor them. You also give relevant reasons, including employment opportunities, salaries and the risk of weak auditing. However, the response addresses the task only partially because these points are brief and largely asserted rather than explained or supported with examples. The comparison with individuals is not addressed, and the government’s role is mentioned mainly as supervision rather than considered as a possible research provider. The response contains 193 words, which is 57 words below the required minimum; the 10 words copied from the prompt are excluded from that count. Develop each reason with explanation or a relevant example, and address all the options in the question.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a coherent overall arrangement: an introduction states your view, the next paragraph gives advantages of private firms, and a contrast paragraph explains the need for government oversight before a conclusion restates your position. Connectors such as “To begin with,” “In contrast” and “In conclusion” help signal this structure. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes abrupt: the link between competition, employee requirements and better research is not made explicit, and “by doing so” has an unclear reference. Some transitions also feel mechanical, while spacing and punctuation around sentence boundaries make the flow less smooth. To strengthen the organisation, explain how each supporting point leads to your conclusion and use clearer references between sentences.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use some relevant topic vocabulary, including “medical research,” “audit system,” “rules and regulations,” “competition” and “competitive salary.” This gives you enough range to communicate the main argument, and the reader can generally understand your intended meaning. However, several word choices and collocations are inaccurate or imprecise, such as “space produced by them,” “requirements of the employees enhance” and “audit their workings.” Spelling errors in “priavate,” “privitization” and “fedralization” also reduce accuracy. Aim for more natural academic phrasing and check spelling carefully; for example, explain that firms can “create opportunities” and that competition may “increase demand for qualified researchers.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including a conditional-style explanation beginning “In developing countries…” and a contrast clause beginning “although.” These attempts help convey relationships between ideas, but some grammatical errors remain and occasionally make sentences harder to follow. For example, “research should be carried” needs an appropriate passive construction, and “there audit system” lacks the correct possessive form. There are also problems with articles and sentence boundaries, as in “on same time” and the run-on transition in “markets a competition is built.” Use a wider range of accurately controlled clauses, and check articles, possessives and punctuation when editing.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.