Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays, many medical research projects are funded by private companies. In your opinion, do you think that research should be carried by private companies, individuals or government?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

In the recent years l, a lot of medical research projects are funded by private organisations. In my opinion, I believe that the government should be the major stakeholder in funding this projects because its their responsibility to protect its citizens. Private companies as well as individuals should also contribute towards medical reaserch as a social responsibility but at moderate level.

Government plays a significant role in cautioning its citizens. Firstly, the state should contribute immensely towards funding medical research as a social responsibility to the tax payers through the purchase of modern medical equipment and also equipping hospitals with enough medication. For example, government should purchase modern machines such as MRI and x-ray machines so that citizens can get proper medication.As a result, the money collected through taxes are ploughed back to society. Secondly, by funding reaserch on proper drugs, the citizens will have access to cheap and proper medication since the privatisation will reduce by removing the cartels.

Private companies as well as individuals can also provide funds in medical sector. By allowing private organisations to participate in providing funds for medical reaserch, their competition will ensure that the market is fare and that the reaserch will be lower in terms of the cost. Moreover, these institutions will also boost the economy by investing in hospitals and providing standard services. For instance, non-governmental organisations often plays a crucial role in setting up and equipping hospitals in remote areas hence improving the welfare of people.

In conclusion, although the private companies and individuals can contribute to standard and modern medical equipment through funding, the state contribution should be more since it is their duty to ensure citizens get proper medication.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear throughout: government should be the main funder, while private companies and individuals should contribute at a more limited level. You address both sides and support your view with relevant examples, including public investment in MRI and X-ray machines and NGOs equipping hospitals in remote areas. This meets the task well. However, some reasoning is asserted rather than fully explained. For example, the claim that public research will make medication cheaper “since the privatisation will reduce by removing the cartels” is unclear, and the point about private-sector competition lowering research costs needs a clearer explanation. Develop these links and distinguish more precisely between funding research and funding hospital equipment to make the argument more fully supported.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction states your position, two body paragraphs discuss government and private contributions, and the conclusion restates your view. Sequencing words such as “Firstly,” “Secondly,” “Moreover,” and “For instance” help readers follow the progression. This is a coherent arrangement, though some connections are mechanical and a few references are unclear. In “the privatisation will reduce by removing the cartels,” it is difficult to identify what “the privatisation” refers to and how the idea connects to the preceding point. The conclusion also repeats the main position without drawing together the distinct arguments. Use clearer links between claims and explanations, and vary transitions so that relationships between ideas—not just their order—are explicit.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic-related vocabulary, including “medical research,” “tax payers,” “privatisation,” “cartels,” and “standard services.” These choices make the subject and your main ideas clear, and you attempt some less common terms. However, several word-choice and collocation problems reduce precision: “cautioning its citizens” does not express the intended duty to protect them, “proper medication” is vague, and “the market is fare” uses the wrong word. There are also spelling errors such as “reaserch,” alongside inconsistent forms such as “organisations” and “institutions” for the same groups. Aim for more precise academic collocations and proofread spelling; this will make your argument sound more natural and exact.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex forms, including a reason clause (“because it’s their responsibility”) and a result clause (“hence improving the welfare of people”). Most sentences remain understandable, but some grammatical errors occur in agreement, articles, possessives, and sentence boundaries. For example, “the money collected through taxes are” should use a singular verb, while “government should purchase” needs an article or plural subject. In “its their responsibility,” the possessive forms conflict, and “medication.As a result” needs a space and clearer punctuation. These errors rarely prevent understanding, but careful editing would improve control. Practise checking subject–verb agreement and articles, and use a wider range of accurately controlled complex sentences.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.