Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays, many medical research projects are funded by private companies. In your opinion, do you think that research should be carried by private companies, individuals or government?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

In today's world, private companies are interested and fund a numerous medical research projects. In my opinion, the gouvernment should be the supervisor and the responsible for those projects, primaly because many illegal acts could be happing in those experiences and the discavored medications price could be unreacheable for normal people and excluded to the rich.

Firstly, the main reson the government is the only capable funder because those research should be supervised by law. The condition of those experiments should follow the international laws for both human and animals. Also the discovered results and informations could be used for illegal purposes, for example, the drugs that are used for specific medical conditions, could be selled for addicts.

Secondly, people are selfish by nature, a company that has been founding a medical research and it succeded, she will be willing to earn profits and won't think of the patients financial status, namely, eczema is a skin desease, that many people suffer from, however the gouvernment only sponsered the research for a cure for a short period and gave up after. Some individuals for Australia, refounded it and created a medication that sale for hundreds of boxes and not accessable for the majority of the suffers for this life-long skin condition.

In conclusion, invistigation should be a public sector where the only gouvrenment allowed to supervise them and make sure no depacement are happen

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You give a clear overall preference for government involvement and offer relevant reasons: legal oversight of experiments and concern that profit-driven companies may make treatments unaffordable. The examples about drugs being misused and eczema treatment help illustrate these points. However, the response addresses the alternatives unevenly: individuals are mentioned only briefly, and the eczema example is difficult to follow, so its relevance and support are unclear. The position also shifts between government as funder, supervisor, and sole authority without explaining which role you recommend. The response is 17 words below the required minimum, which limits the space available to develop your ideas. Explain the roles of companies and individuals more directly and extend one example with clear details.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs signposted by “Firstly” and “Secondly,” and a conclusion. This gives the reader a basic route through your argument. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes difficult to follow, particularly in the eczema example, where the government’s involvement, the individuals’ contribution, and the medication’s cost are compressed into one long sentence. Some links are also unclear, such as “and excluded to the rich,” and the conclusion introduces the idea of government supervision without clearly summarising the earlier argument. Use shorter sentences to separate each step in an example, and make references such as “those projects” and “them” clearly identify their subject.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some topic-relevant vocabulary, including “medical research,” “international laws,” “illegal purposes,” “patients’ financial status,” and “life-long skin condition.” These choices show an attempt to discuss regulation, funding, and access. However, spelling and word-choice errors are frequent and sometimes make the meaning difficult to understand: “gouvernment,” “primaly,” “discovered medications price,” and “not accessable” are examples. Several phrases are also unnatural, such as “fund a numerous” and “sale for hundreds of boxes.” Build accuracy with common collocations before reaching for more complex wording—for example, “fund numerous research projects,” “the price of newly developed medicines,” and “make a treatment available.” Proofreading spelling and word forms would make your ideas clearer.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and complex sentences, including a conditional structure in “a company … will be willing to earn profits” and a relative clause in “a skin disease, that many people suffer from.” However, errors are frequent, and some sentences are difficult to interpret. Examples include “the government should be the supervisor and the responsible,” “those research should be supervised,” and “the only government allowed to supervise them.” The long sentence beginning “a company that has been founding…” also has problems with clause structure and agreement, making the relationship between ideas unclear. Practise accurate articles, plurals, verb forms, and sentence boundaries. For instance, separate the eczema example into shorter sentences and check that each clause has a clear subject and verb.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.