Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays, many medical research projects are funded by private companies. In your opinion, do you think that research should be carried by private companies, individuals or government?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The medical tenders is funded to private companies which is more convenient rather than government or peoples.In my opinion these research projects should be remain same as early on goes to private companies.

In my opinion, the private companies is better than the government because it has more number of varaties instrument for research. The private companies have much more funding and more convenient, relaible rather than government. In recent years the private companies take major role in pandemic situations and save peoples live.

Futhermore, the private companies have more talented scientist than the governmant. they provide more facilities to their employees. Whereas, the government do not give the facilities to their workers. This is also the major factor the medical project are funded by private companies. If we see in recent year goverment shows very less intrest in the field of medical research because they have more country issue to resolve them.

To conclude, In my point of view the private companies are playing very important role in field of medical than the government.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You give a clear preference for private companies, stating that they have more research instruments, funding and talented scientists, and you refer to their role during pandemic situations. These points are relevant to the question. However, the response addresses the issue only partially: it does not meaningfully consider whether individuals should conduct or fund research, and the reasons in favour of private companies are asserted rather than explained with specific examples. The claim that companies “save peoples live,” for instance, would be stronger if you named a research achievement or explained how it helped. The response is also below the required 250 words, which limits the opportunity to develop and support your position. Expand each reason and address all the options in the prompt.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, two body paragraphs and a conclusion. Paragraphs generally group related points, and signposts such as “Furthermore” and “To conclude” help the reader follow the basic direction. However, progression within the paragraphs is limited: several claims are placed next to one another without explaining how they connect, and the conclusion mainly repeats the opinion rather than drawing together the reasons. Some linking is mechanical, particularly the repeated use of “In my opinion” and “This is also the major factor.” Develop a clearer sequence—for example, state one reason, explain its effect, and then give an example—and use referencing and transitions to show those relationships.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some topic-related vocabulary, including “medical research,” “funding,” “facilities,” and “scientist,” so the main subject is usually understandable. However, the range is limited and several inaccurate word choices, collocations and spelling errors make the writing less clear or natural. Examples include “medical tenders” where you appear to mean medical research projects, “varaties instrument,” “relaible,” and “country issue.” “Save peoples live” is also an imprecise expression for describing a medical contribution. Aim to use accurate topic phrases such as “research equipment,” “reliable funding,” and “public health challenges.” Check spelling carefully and choose words that express the intended meaning precisely rather than relying on broad or repeated terms such as “more” and “important role.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple statements and longer sentences, including a contrast introduced by “Whereas,” and the reader can generally identify your main position. However, the range of sentence structures is limited, and errors in agreement, verb forms, articles and sentence boundaries occur frequently. For example, “The private companies is” should use a plural verb, while “should be remain” combines incompatible verb forms. In “the medical project are funded,” the subject and verb do not agree. Capitalisation and punctuation also need attention, as in “they provide” after a full stop and the comma-free opening sentence. Practise building accurate sentences with one main clause and a supporting clause, then check subject–verb agreement and verb forms before adding more complex structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.