Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-11-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays, many medical research projects are funded by private companies. In your opinion, do you think that research should be carried by private companies, individuals or government?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Private companies are providing fund for many medical research projects currently. Private companies can provide fund in research but then the projects ownership will be on the hand of that company. I believe the research should be carried by government because of the ownership as research projects can contribute in a country's development and it can help the citizens if it succeed.

One major reason government should fund for the medical research project is ownership. if the government is the owner of the project by funding it and the research project succeed, the country can apply the solution in free or maybe by spending little amount of money. Additionally, it can sell the solution in different countries. In this way, third party can't interfere and it will benefit the government of the country. Developed countries' government spends huge amount of money on research, and when the research succeed the country sell the solutions in other countries, and this is how they become the richest and powerful countries in the world. For instance, in Covid the USA and China researched and found out the medicine for the diseases, it helped the people of the country and also they could sell it outside of the country and earned huge amount of money.

Another reason government should fund in medical sector is that it can benefit the citizens of the country. If the research succeed, the citizens can buy the solution from the country, and they don't need to buy them from different countries in an expensive rate. Additionally, if that research become succeed for any difficult disease, it can save peoples' lives. If a country purchase medical related appliances from outside of the country or from any private company, it cost huge chunk of money, and later citizens need to pay huge bills to avail those facalities. To illustrates, In Bangladesh labs, the machines we use to diagnosis paitents are imported from foreign countries, and those are very expensive machines, and the paitents family end up by paying huge chunk of money to diagnosis the paitent. However, not all citizens can afford the expensive treatment and die without any treatment.

To conclude, Though private companies are funding nowadays, I believe the medical research projects should be funded by government to hold the ownership as it can save citizens and develop the country.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear from the introduction to the conclusion: you argue that governments should fund medical research because they can retain ownership and make its benefits available to citizens. Both reasons are relevant, and the Bangladesh example helps illustrate the cost of relying on imported equipment. This meets the task well, with a clear response and supporting examples. However, the discussion is not equally developed: the claim that research income makes countries “the richest and powerful” is broad and needs more precise explanation, while the Covid example does not clearly identify a medicine or distinguish research from vaccine development. Addressing the role of individuals, or explaining more directly why private funding is less suitable, would make the comparison more complete and strengthen the development of your position.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction states your view, two body paragraphs present separate reasons, and the conclusion restates your position. Signposting such as “One major reason,” “Another reason,” and “To conclude” makes the progression easy to follow. The examples are generally placed alongside the point they support. Some connections, however, are mechanical or unclear. In the first body paragraph, the move from public ownership to selling solutions abroad and then to national wealth needs a more explicit explanation. The second paragraph also shifts from research outcomes to imported diagnostic machines without fully linking the two. Use referencing and transitions to show how each example supports the specific claim, rather than relying mainly on repeated “Additionally” and “if” constructions.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate your main ideas, including “ownership,” “medical research projects,” “citizens,” and “imported.” There are also attempts at more specific expressions, such as “third party” and “medical-related appliances.” However, several noticeable word-choice and collocation problems make parts of the response less natural: “provide fund,” “research succeed,” “in an expensive rate,” and “huge chunk of money.” Some word forms and spellings are also inaccurate, including “facalities,” “paitents,” and “diagnosis” where a noun is needed. These errors do not prevent the reader from understanding the argument, but they limit precision. Build a bank of accurate collocations for funding, research outcomes, treatment costs, and medical equipment, and check spelling and word forms during revision.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex sentences, including conditional structures such as “If the research succeed, the citizens can buy the solution” and a concession in the conclusion beginning “Though private companies are funding nowadays.” This gives the response some structural variety, and the main meaning is generally clear. However, errors recur in verb forms, agreement, articles, and sentence construction. For example, “if the research succeed” needs a singular verb, while “the country sell” and “it cost” also show agreement problems. The opening “Private companies are providing fund” has an inaccurate grammatical pattern, and “the projects ownership will be on the hand” is awkwardly constructed. Improve control of subject–verb agreement and conditional clauses, and proofread sentence boundaries and punctuation, especially capitalization after full stops.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.